From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755953AbYDPWzb (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:55:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752315AbYDPWzV (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:55:21 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:36643 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751235AbYDPWzV (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:55:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18438.33744.389334.543623@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:55:12 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Alexander van Heukelum , Alexander van Heukelum , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix find_next_bit breakage on ppc and powerpc In-Reply-To: <20080416144051.GH24383@elte.hu> References: <1208191719.12568.1247788911@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20080416125724.GC6304@elte.hu> <20080416135508.GA16439@mailshack.com> <20080416144051.GH24383@elte.hu> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar writes: > > * Alexander van Heukelum wrote: > > > Powerpc (and ppc) have their have some code in their bitops.h which > > used to be exacly the same as asm-generic/bitops/find.h. Include this > > header instead. > > > > This should also fix the compile problems due to the generic > > find_next_bit changes. Those were fixed by Thomas Gleixner in > > asm-generic/bitops/find.h earlier. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum > > thanks, applied. I dropped: Why are powerpc (and ppc) patches - not being sent to the powerpc maintainer (me) - not being cc'd to the linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org list - ending up going through the x86 tree? How come patches to unify x86_32 and x86_64 bitops need to end up touching powerpc? Paul.