mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: linux-next crash during very early boot
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:14:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18440.1461208466@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58269.1460729433@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1917 bytes --]

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:10:33 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu said:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:35:47 +0900, Joonsoo Kim said:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:29:46PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> > > I'm seeing my laptop crash/wedge up/something during very early
> > > boot - before it can write anything to the console.  Nothing in pstore,
> > > need to hold down the power button for 6 seconds and reboot.
> > >
> > > git bisect points at:
> > >
> > > commit 7a6bacb133752beacb76775797fd550417e9d3a2
> > > Author: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> > > Date:   Thu Apr 7 13:59:39 2016 +1000
> > >
> > >     mm/slab: factor out kmem_cache_node initialization code
> > >
> > >     It can be reused on other place, so factor out it.  Following patch will
> > >     use it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Not sure what the problem is - the logic *looks* ok at first read.  The
> > > patch *does* remove a spin_lock_irq() - but I find it difficult to
> > > believe that with it gone, my laptop is able to hit the race condition
> > > the spinlock protects against *every single boot*.
> > >
> > > The only other thing I see is that n->free_limit used to be assigned
> > > every time, and now it's only assigned at initial creation.
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > My fault. It should be assgined every time. Please test below patch.
> > I will send it with proper SOB after you confirm the problem disappear.
> > Thanks for report and analysis!
>
> Following up - I verified that it was your patch series and not a bad bisect
> by starting with a clean next-20160413 and reverting that series - and the
> resulting kernel boots fine.

Following up some more - next-20160420 seems to work just fine, even with
no sign in 'git log -- mm/slab.c' of the fix-patch....

I'm obviously having a very bad "things that go bump in the night" with
kernels lately - this makes 3 different "makes no sense" things I've posted
in the last 6 hours... :)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 848 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14  0:29 Valdis Kletnieks
2016-04-14  1:35 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-14 19:22   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2016-04-15  1:25     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-15 14:10   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2016-04-20  8:13     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-21  3:14     ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18440.1461208466@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
    --to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®