From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0662C04AB6 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAD9216FD for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="BjzA/Baj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727251AbfE1Rc2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 13:32:28 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:52630 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726602AbfE1Rc1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 13:32:27 -0400 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4SHWLEc125462; Tue, 28 May 2019 12:32:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1559064741; bh=+XAh1rn1DmZmFVkCu8Os6B8Nn8qFNsfps9mYhSpW/OU=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BjzA/Baj5LeyaDfxIOsk6yuJaPFhKP7auVMPihrW5GVeZrTjtI4OdylSyEMgWgGlx ayb6HtHqmiM/zUqTd66v/ZihbcRlP6/UiUU4YBkwW0lt/cuK/THxHKKLKsKyPpjSZU KZuS0j9dpa7RJ5OFzFeYIrt3MHaTdJPLuPPOo+Js= Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (dlee105.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.35]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4SHWLeG073786 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 May 2019 12:32:21 -0500 Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 28 May 2019 12:32:21 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 28 May 2019 12:32:21 -0500 Received: from [10.250.65.13] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4SHWLho064319; Tue, 28 May 2019 12:32:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] leds: multicolor: Add sysfs interface definition To: Jacek Anaszewski , , CC: , , References: <20190523190820.29375-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20190523190820.29375-2-dmurphy@ti.com> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: <185abdd6-100c-0a71-2da9-8f556d8ea701@ti.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 12:32:21 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jacek On 5/27/19 3:00 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thank you for the update. > > One thing is missing here - we need to document how legacy brightness > levels map to the sub-LED color levels, i.e. what you do in > multicolor_set_brightness(). Ok so i will need to document the algorithm that is used to determine the color LED brightness. Dan > > Best regards, > Jacek Anaszewski > >