From: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Sandy Harris <pashley@storm.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch[ Simple Topology API
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 08:45:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1860160670.1026809142@[10.10.2.3]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1sn2knevw.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
>> They can also go to no-glue 8-way:
>>
>> I/O -- A ------ B ------ E ------ G -- I/O
>> | | | |
>> | | | |
>> I/O -- C ------ D ------ F ------ H -- I/O
>
>
> I think the 8-way topology is a little more interesting than
> presented. But if not it does look like you can run into issues.
> The more I look at it there appears to be a strong dynamic balance
> in the architecture between having just enough bandwidth, and low
> enough latency not to become a bottleneck, and having a low hardware
> cost.
Whilst I don't have a definitive diagram, the "back of a napkin"
sketches we came up with at an OLS dinner looked like this:
I/O -- A ------ B ---- E ------ G -- I/O
| \/ |
| /\ |
I/O -- C ------ D ---- F ------ H -- I/O
(please excuse my poor artistic skills). That reduces the max
hops from 4 to 3 (if I haven't screwed something up).
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-16 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3D2F75D7.3060105@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3D2F9521.96D7080B@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-07-13 20:08 ` Andi Kleen
2002-07-14 19:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-14 19:43 ` Andi Kleen
2002-07-15 2:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-07-15 15:25 ` Sandy Harris
2002-07-15 16:33 ` Chris Friesen
2002-07-16 10:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-07-16 12:59 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-16 15:45 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-07-16 19:03 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-07-16 22:29 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-07-17 0:21 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-07-15 17:48 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-07-15 19:50 Jukka Honkela
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-13 0:35 Matthew Dobson
2002-07-13 2:49 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-15 18:49 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-07-13 8:04 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-13 17:13 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-07-15 23:52 ` Matthew Dobson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='1860160670.1026809142@[10.10.2.3]' \
--to=martin.bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pashley@storm.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®