From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:07:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18607840.Is41JcgqAR@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo7QBNzaMKOGpkrPxop+WN+RMAoeOBUPiFDi9HFyH+UoOQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 05:34:32 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:01:39 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> >> >> the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to make it support
> >> >> pci root bus hotplug. So it would be reasonable for us to align other
> >> >> platform to x86
> >> >> changes after pci root bus hotplug change is completely done.
> >> >
> >> > OK, I opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52531 as a
> >> > way to keep track of this consistency issue and merged
> >> > pci/yinghai-survey-resources to my -next branch.
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot. will send other pci root bus hotplug out.
> >>
> >> question: now Rafael's tree has acpi-scan branch and it touches pci-root.c.
> >>
> >> so is it ok for me to base patches on your pci/next and his pm/acpi-scan?
> >> how?
> >> can you two have some arrangement like you pulling Rafael's branch?
> >
> > My acpi-scan branch is not going to be rebased going forward, so it can be
> > pulled from safely if that helps.
>
> I'm happy to do that, but it is outside the scope of my limited git
> experience. My guess is that I should do this (doing the pull into a
> branch which I later merge into my -next branch):
>
> $ git checkout -b pci/yinghai-survey-resources+acpi-scan
> pci/yinghai-survey-resources
> $ git pull --no-ff --log
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git
> acpi-scan
> $ vi drivers/acpi/pci_root.c # resolve conflicts
> $ git add drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> $ git commit
>
> $ git checkout next
> $ git merge --no-ff --log pci/yinghai-survey-resources+acpi-scan
>
> Is that reasonable?
Yes, it looks reasonable.
> This won't cause issues when both Rafael and I ask Linus to pull from our
> trees later?
No, it won't, as long as I don't rebase the original acpi-scan branch (which
I'm not going to do) and you don't rebase your
pci/yinghai-survey-resources+acpi-scan branch going forward.
The pull makes your tree contain the same commits (i.e. commit IDs along with
the data) that are in my acpi-scan branch, so when Linus merges them together,
git will notice that the commits are the same.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-10 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20121030040237.GA10472@google.com>
2012-11-04 4:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-11-04 4:39 ` [PATCH 1/8] PCI, x86: Separate out pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources() Yinghai Lu
2012-11-04 4:39 ` [PATCH 2/8] PCI, x86: Separate out pcibios_allocate_dev_resources() Yinghai Lu
2012-11-04 4:39 ` [PATCH 3/8] PCI, x86: Let pcibios_allocate_bus_resources() take bus instead Yinghai Lu
2012-11-04 4:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] PCI, x86: Separate out rom resource claim Yinghai Lu
2012-11-04 4:39 ` [PATCH 5/8] PCI, x86: Add pcibios_fw_addr_done Yinghai Lu
2012-11-04 4:39 ` [PATCH 6/8] PCI, x86: Remove __init for hw/fw allocated functions Yinghai Lu
2012-11-04 4:39 ` [PATCH 7/8] PCI, x86: Claim FW allocated resources in hot add path Yinghai Lu
2012-11-04 4:39 ` [PATCH 8/8] PCI, ACPI: reserve fw allocated resource for hot added root bus Yinghai Lu
2012-12-07 7:15 ` [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add " Yinghai Lu
2013-01-07 23:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-08 17:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-08 18:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-09 17:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-09 17:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-09 18:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-09 19:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-09 20:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-10 0:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-10 13:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-01-10 14:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-09 20:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-02 21:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-02 22:55 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18607840.Is41JcgqAR@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®