From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: fix deadlock
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:46:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18608.26903.80591.84111@harpo.it.uu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0808231919450.6466@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
Maciej W. Rozycki writes:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > The sporadic nature of the bug means that it will probably take a
> > > couple of days of testing and dozens of reboots w/o problems before
> > > I'm confident to say that the problem's been fixed.
> >
> > btw., i've seen that lockup too on a testbox - but havent been able to
> > track it down yet. You went further and presented the bug on a plate by
> > tracking it down to the loop in get_rtc_time() - so now we can both test
> > the fix and see whether the lockups are gone.
>
> Hmm, waiting for 20ms with interrupts disabled sounds like a bad idea --
> a lot of system timer ticks may be lost and some devices may not be happy
> about such a delay either (serial?). I think your proposal only papers
> over the actual bug and it should simply be forbidden to call this
> function with interrupts disabled.
>
> I can see this is a part of the legacy RTC interface, so except from the
> long delay the function itself may have a chance to work with interrupts
> disabled. But with the modern RTC library this is no longer true as some
> RTC chips it supports can only be accessed with interrupts enabled,
> because their accessor functions may sleep. This is for example common
> with RTC chips wired through I2C.
>
> Therefore I think to avoid propagating the design problem with places
> calling get_rtc_time() when they eventually switch to the RTC library it
> would be better to put:
>
> BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
>
> into get_rtc_time() now and fix the callers which happen to trigger it.
On my C2D, I've only seen the lockup happen when user-space is
using hwclock to init system time (early init) or to flush system
time to the hw (end of shutdown/reboot). And the lockup is always
in hpet_rtc_interrupt. I've never ever seen the lockup while the
system is up and running normally.
So I suspect a bad interaction between the HPET RTC stuff and
the RTC user-space interface.
/Mikael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-23 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-23 9:48 [BUG] get_rtc_time() triggers NMI watchdog in hpet_rtc_interrupt() Mikael Pettersson
2008-08-23 16:01 ` [PATCH] rtc: fix deadlock Ingo Molnar
2008-08-23 16:58 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-08-23 17:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-23 18:45 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-08-23 19:46 ` Mikael Pettersson [this message]
2008-08-29 11:48 ` [PATCH] rtc: fix deadlock: fixes regression since 2.6.24 Frank van Maarseveen
2008-09-06 18:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-01 23:51 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2008-08-24 9:14 ` [BUG] get_rtc_time() triggers NMI watchdog in hpet_rtc_interrupt() Vegard Nossum
2008-08-24 10:32 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-08-24 11:48 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-26 10:25 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-08-26 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-27 8:54 ` Alan Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18608.26903.80591.84111@harpo.it.uu.se \
--to=mikpe@it.uu.se \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®