mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Greentime Hu <greentime@andestech.com>,
	Vincent Chen <vincentc@andestech.com>,
	Zong Li <zong@andestech.com>, Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/5] Cleanup ISA string setting
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 19:13:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1867bb22-1858-0f14-e077-5cb4b2e50446@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181014234639.GA14835@andestech.com>

Hi Alan,

On 10/14/2018 04:46 PM, Alan Kao wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 05:02:05PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With this patch in -next applied, I get the following error
>> when building riscv:defconfig.
> 
> I guess what you meant was this commit:
> commit 0a5bee05fc67ce2044b8d91a18abbf14042da531
> 

Yes, sorry, I just blindly assumed that the last version I found must have caused
the problem. You are right, v8 actually fixes it (as suggested below).

> The modification in Makefile was
> 
> -endif
> -
> -KBUILD_AFLAGS += -march=$(KBUILD_MARCH)$(KBUILD_ARCH_A)fd$(KBUILD_ARCH_C)
> +# ISA string setting
> +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I)       := rv32im
> +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_ARCH_RV64I)       := rv64im
> +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_A)      := $(riscv-march-y)aj
> +riscv-march-y                          := fd
> +riscv-march-$(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C)      := $(riscv-march-y)c
> 
> and the ":= fd" line was wrong.  It should have been
> 
> +riscv-march-y                          := $(riscv-march-y)fd
> 
>>
>>
>> What am I missing ? Does RISC-V now require a new non-upstream compiler ?
>> Or a special version of make ? I am currently using GNU Make 4.1.
> 
> So I sent the v8 to fix this problem.
> Sorry for the inconvinience.
> 

No worries. At least this problem was (is going to be) easy to fix.
And, yes, I confirmed that the one-line change above fixes the problem.

Guenter

>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guenter
>>
>> ---
> 
> And Palmer, it seems that the patch that causes this build error has been
> pulled into linux-next.  Any idea how to fix that one?
> 
> Many thanks,
> Alan
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-15  2:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-09  2:18 [PATCH v8 0/5] riscv: Add support to no-FPU systems Alan Kao
2018-10-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] Extract FPU context operations from entry.S Alan Kao
2018-10-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] Refactor FPU code in signal setup/return procedures Alan Kao
2018-10-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] Cleanup ISA string setting Alan Kao
2018-10-14  0:02   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-10-14 23:46     ` Alan Kao
2018-10-15  2:13       ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2018-10-15 22:34       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-16 13:18         ` Guenter Roeck
2018-10-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] Allow to disable FPU support Alan Kao
2018-10-09  2:18 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] Auto-detect whether a FPU exists Alan Kao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1867bb22-1858-0f14-e077-5cb4b2e50446@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=alankao@andestech.com \
    --cc=greentime@andestech.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nickhu@andestech.com \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=vincentc@andestech.com \
    --cc=zong@andestech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®