From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754705AbbLJAWj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 9 Dec 2015 19:22:39 -0500
Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:43074 "HELO
	v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with SMTP id S1752822AbbLJAWi (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 9 Dec 2015 19:22:38 -0500
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Radivoje Jovanovic <radivoje.jovanovic@intel.com>,
        Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikarashi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
        Ajay Thomas <ajay.thomas.david.rajamanickam@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powercap, intel_rapl.c, fix BIOS lock check
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 01:52:37 +0100
Message-ID: <1869286.F6FKdkBDy4@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.1.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20151209153123.60220026@icelake>
References: <1449667872-11197-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> <5563622.j8xTDST9Ds@vostro.rjw.lan> <20151209153123.60220026@icelake>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday, December 09, 2015 03:31:23 PM Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:38:27 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> 
> > OK, I've put it into my bleeding-edge branch as 4.5 candidate, but do
> > we want it in "stable" and therefore should it be pushed for 4.4?
> yes, it is a bug fix that may affect many systems locked by BIOS.

So which "stable" series in particular should it go to?  All applicable?

Thanks,
Rafael