From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@freescale.com>
Cc: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of_gpio: Return GPIO flags from of_get_gpio()
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:32:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18733.56480.373527.669097@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811261423120.5161@t2.domain.actdsltmp>
Trent Piepho writes:
> > Alternatively you could add a new function (called, for instance,
> > of_get_gpio_flags) with the extra parameter to eliminate the need to
> > change any drivers at this stage, since they all seem to pass NULL for
> > the flags argument.
>
> But if we did this every time any exported function needs to change, think
> how bloated the API would be with cruft.
I don't buy the argument that we can't add one thing because if we
added a hundred that would be too much. You could add
of_get_gpio_flags, get that upstream, then get the driver patches
upstream, then submit a patch to remove of_get_gpio. Alternatively
you could make of_get_gpio a macro or inline function in of_gpio.h.
If you really want to change everything in one hit you'll have to get
acks + agreement for the change to go upstream via my tree from all
the relevant driver maintainers first. I don't see any particular
advantage to doing it that way, though.
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-26 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-24 23:04 OpenFirmware GPIO LED driver Trent Piepho
2008-10-24 23:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] of_gpio: Return GPIO flags from of_get_gpio() Trent Piepho
2008-10-24 23:32 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-28 14:39 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-28 14:53 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-28 15:16 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-28 15:42 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-28 16:56 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-28 17:40 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-30 2:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] of_gpio: Return GPIO flags from of_get_gpio()A Trent Piepho
2008-10-30 11:15 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-31 2:03 ` [PATCH v2] of_gpio: Return GPIO flags from of_get_gpio() Trent Piepho
2008-11-26 16:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-26 21:38 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-11-26 22:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-26 22:35 ` Trent Piepho
2008-11-26 22:58 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-26 23:32 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2008-10-24 23:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] leds: Support OpenFirmware led bindings Trent Piepho
2008-10-24 23:50 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-24 23:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] leds: Add option to have GPIO LEDs start on Trent Piepho
2008-10-24 23:59 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-24 23:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] leds: Let GPIO LEDs keep their current state Trent Piepho
2008-10-25 0:04 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-17 14:50 ` Richard Purdie
2008-11-21 1:05 ` Trent Piepho
2008-11-23 12:31 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-03 10:04 ` Richard Purdie
2008-12-10 4:33 ` Trent Piepho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18733.56480.373527.669097@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=tpiepho@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®