mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>,
	"Zhao, Yakui" <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net" 
	<openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] ACPI/IPMI: Cleanup several acpi_ipmi_device members
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:38:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1877208.aj3aZU16C0@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E8802435B14@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On Friday, July 26, 2013 01:25:12 AM Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@sisk.pl]
> > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 6:26 AM
> > 
> > On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 04:10:06 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> > > This is a trivial patch:
> > > 1. Deletes a member of the acpi_ipmi_device - smi_data which is not
> > >    actually used.
> > > 2. Updates a member of the acpi_ipmi_device - pnp_dev which is only used
> > >    by dev_warn() invocations, so changes it to struct device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c |   30 ++++++++++++++----------------
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c index
> > > 0ee1ea6..7f93ffd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> > > @@ -63,11 +63,10 @@ struct acpi_ipmi_device {
> > >  	struct list_head tx_msg_list;
> > >  	spinlock_t	tx_msg_lock;
> > >  	acpi_handle handle;
> > > -	struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev;
> > > +	struct device *dev;
> > >  	ipmi_user_t	user_interface;
> > >  	int ipmi_ifnum; /* IPMI interface number */
> > >  	long curr_msgid;
> > > -	struct ipmi_smi_info smi_data;
> > >  	atomic_t refcnt;
> > >  };
> > >
> > > @@ -132,7 +131,7 @@ static struct ipmi_driver_data driver_data = {  };
> > >
> > >  static struct acpi_ipmi_device *
> > > -ipmi_dev_alloc(int iface, struct ipmi_smi_info *smi_data, acpi_handle
> > > handle)
> > > +ipmi_dev_alloc(int iface, struct device *pdev, acpi_handle handle)
> > 
> > Why is the second arg called pdev?
> 
> OK, I will change it to dev.

OK, thanks.

> > 
> > >  {
> > >  	struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi_device;
> > >  	int err;
> > > @@ -148,14 +147,13 @@ ipmi_dev_alloc(int iface, struct ipmi_smi_info
> > *smi_data, acpi_handle handle)
> > >  	spin_lock_init(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
> > >
> > >  	ipmi_device->handle = handle;
> > > -	ipmi_device->pnp_dev = to_pnp_dev(get_device(smi_data->dev));
> > > -	memcpy(&ipmi_device->smi_data, smi_data, sizeof(struct
> > ipmi_smi_info));
> > > +	ipmi_device->dev = get_device(pdev);
> > >  	ipmi_device->ipmi_ifnum = iface;
> > >
> > >  	err = ipmi_create_user(iface, &driver_data.ipmi_hndlrs,
> > >  			       ipmi_device, &user);
> > >  	if (err) {
> > > -		put_device(smi_data->dev);
> > > +		put_device(pdev);
> > >  		kfree(ipmi_device);
> > >  		return NULL;
> > >  	}
> > > @@ -175,7 +173,7 @@ acpi_ipmi_dev_get(struct acpi_ipmi_device
> > > *ipmi_device)  static void ipmi_dev_release(struct acpi_ipmi_device
> > > *ipmi_device)  {
> > >  	ipmi_destroy_user(ipmi_device->user_interface);
> > > -	put_device(ipmi_device->smi_data.dev);
> > > +	put_device(ipmi_device->dev);
> > >  	kfree(ipmi_device);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -263,7 +261,7 @@ static int acpi_format_ipmi_request(struct
> > acpi_ipmi_msg *tx_msg,
> > >  	buffer = (struct acpi_ipmi_buffer *)value;
> > >  	/* copy the tx message data */
> > >  	if (buffer->length > ACPI_IPMI_MAX_MSG_LENGTH) {
> > > -		dev_WARN_ONCE(&tx_msg->device->pnp_dev->dev, true,
> > > +		dev_WARN_ONCE(tx_msg->device->dev, true,
> > >  			      "Unexpected request (msg len %d).\n",
> > >  			      buffer->length);
> > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > > @@ -382,11 +380,11 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct
> > ipmi_recv_msg *msg, void *user_msg_data)
> > >  	struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi_device = user_msg_data;
> > >  	int msg_found = 0;
> > >  	struct acpi_ipmi_msg *tx_msg;
> > > -	struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev = ipmi_device->pnp_dev;
> > > +	struct device *dev = ipmi_device->dev;
> > >  	unsigned long flags;
> > >
> > >  	if (msg->user != ipmi_device->user_interface) {
> > > -		dev_warn(&pnp_dev->dev,
> > > +		dev_warn(dev,
> > >  			 "Unexpected response is returned. returned user %p, expected
> > user %p\n",
> > >  			 msg->user, ipmi_device->user_interface);
> > >  		goto out_msg;
> > > @@ -404,7 +402,7 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi_recv_msg
> > *msg, void *user_msg_data)
> > >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
> > >
> > >  	if (!msg_found) {
> > > -		dev_warn(&pnp_dev->dev,
> > > +		dev_warn(dev,
> > >  			 "Unexpected response (msg id %ld) is returned.\n",
> > >  			 msg->msgid);
> > >  		goto out_msg;
> > > @@ -412,7 +410,7 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi_recv_msg
> > > *msg, void *user_msg_data)
> > >
> > >  	/* copy the response data to Rx_data buffer */
> > >  	if (msg->msg.data_len > ACPI_IPMI_MAX_MSG_LENGTH) {
> > > -		dev_WARN_ONCE(&pnp_dev->dev, true,
> > > +		dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, true,
> > >  			      "Unexpected response (msg len %d).\n",
> > >  			      msg->msg.data_len);
> > >  		goto out_comp;
> > > @@ -431,7 +429,7 @@ out_msg:
> > >  static void ipmi_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev)  {
> > >  	struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi_device, *temp;
> > > -	struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev;
> > > +	struct device *pdev;
> > 
> > And here?
> 
> The dev is the parameter of the ipmi_register_bmc(), it is not possible to name the "struct ipmi_smi_info " as dev here for this quick fix.

Right.  What about smi_dev?  Or just use smi_data.dev directly?  It's just two
places and shouldn't cause any line wraps to happen.

Rafael


> > >  	int err;
> > >  	struct ipmi_smi_info smi_data;
> > >  	acpi_handle handle;
> > > @@ -445,11 +443,11 @@ static void ipmi_register_bmc(int iface, struct
> > device *dev)
> > >  	handle = smi_data.addr_info.acpi_info.acpi_handle;
> > >  	if (!handle)
> > >  		goto err_ref;
> > > -	pnp_dev = to_pnp_dev(smi_data.dev);
> > > +	pdev = smi_data.dev;
> > >
> > > -	ipmi_device = ipmi_dev_alloc(iface, &smi_data, handle);
> > > +	ipmi_device = ipmi_dev_alloc(iface, pdev, handle);
> > >  	if (!ipmi_device) {
> > > -		dev_warn(&pnp_dev->dev, "Can't create IPMI user interface\n");
> > > +		dev_warn(pdev, "Can't create IPMI user interface\n");
> > >  		goto err_ref;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > I speak only for myself.
> > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-26 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1370652213.git.lv.zheng@intel.com>
2013-07-23  8:08 ` [PATCH 00/13] ACPI/IPMI: Fix several issues in the current codes Lv Zheng
2013-07-23  8:08   ` [PATCH 01/13] ACPI/IPMI: Fix potential response buffer overflow Lv Zheng
2013-07-23 14:54     ` Greg KH
2013-07-24  0:21       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-24  0:44       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-23  8:09   ` [PATCH 02/13] ACPI/IPMI: Fix atomic context requirement of ipmi_msg_handler() Lv Zheng
2013-07-23  8:09   ` [PATCH 03/13] ACPI/IPMI: Fix race caused by the unprotected ACPI IPMI transfers Lv Zheng
2013-07-24 23:38     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-25  3:09       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-25 12:06         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-25 18:12           ` Corey Minyard
2013-07-25 19:32             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-26  0:18               ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-26  0:16             ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-26  0:48               ` Corey Minyard
2013-07-26  1:30                 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-26  0:09           ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-23  8:09   ` [PATCH 04/13] ACPI/IPMI: Fix race caused by the unprotected ACPI IPMI user Lv Zheng
2013-07-25 21:59     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-26  1:17       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-23  8:09   ` [PATCH 05/13] ACPI/IPMI: Fix issue caused by the per-device registration of the IPMI operation region handler Lv Zheng
2013-07-23  8:09   ` [PATCH 06/13] ACPI/IPMI: Add reference counting for ACPI operation region handlers Lv Zheng
2013-07-25 20:27     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-26  0:47       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-26  8:09         ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-26 14:00         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-29  1:43           ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-25 21:29     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-26  1:54       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-26  8:15         ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-26 14:49         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-29  1:56           ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-23  8:09   ` [PATCH 07/13] ACPI/IPMI: Add reference counting for ACPI IPMI transfers Lv Zheng
2013-07-25 22:23     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-26  1:21       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-26 13:41         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-23  8:10   ` [PATCH 08/13] ACPI/IPMI: Cleanup several acpi_ipmi_device members Lv Zheng
2013-07-25 22:25     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-26  1:25       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-26 13:38         ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-07-29  1:12           ` Zheng, Lv
2013-07-23  8:10   ` [PATCH 09/13] ACPI/IPMI: Cleanup some initialization codes Lv Zheng
2013-07-23  8:10   ` [PATCH 10/13] ACPI/IPMI: Cleanup some inclusion codes Lv Zheng
2013-07-23  8:10   ` [PATCH 11/13] ACPI/IPMI: Cleanup some Kconfig codes Lv Zheng
2013-07-23  8:10   ` [PATCH 12/13] Testing: Add module load/unload test suite Lv Zheng
2013-07-23  8:10   ` [PATCH 13/13] ACPI/IPMI: Add IPMI operation region test device driver Lv Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1877208.aj3aZU16C0@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=minyard@acm.org \
    --cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®