mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: "Mariusz Koz³owski" <sp3fxc@linuxfocus.org>,
	"john stultz" <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: odd clock thing...
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:49:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18827512.1083250159@42.150.104.212.access.eclipse.net.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404101526.10695.sp3fxc@linuxfocus.org>

--On 10 April 2004 15:26 +0200 Mariusz Koz³owski <sp3fxc@linuxfocus.org>
wrote:

> 	I did what you told me to do. I disabled ACPI PM time source. There is a 
> significant change. The system clock is running still too fast but it is
> a  very small difference. After 24 hours the difference is 2 minutes
> ahead. I  don't know what to think about it. Is it precise enough or
> should I do some  more tests. As far as I remember the system clock on
> this machine was runnig  perfectly fine so that even after one week it
> was still in sync with other  electronic clocks I have. I think I'll try
> to disable CPUfreq and see if it  helps. 

I think if your system clock is as good as 2 minutes per day you are
'normal'.  System clocks are generally very stable but not very accurate,
ie. they will consistently gain or lose the same ammount per day, but not
be that good.  That is one of the reasons NTP is very effective on a
system, it can figure out how rubbish your clock is and correct for it
because of that stability.

-apw

      reply	other threads:[~2004-04-29 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-06 18:04 Mariusz Kozłowski
2004-04-07 18:39 ` john stultz
2004-04-10 13:26   ` Mariusz Kozłowski
2004-04-29 13:49     ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18827512.1083250159@42.150.104.212.access.eclipse.net.uk \
    --to=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sp3fxc@linuxfocus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®