mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] x86/resctrl: Misc cleanup
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:31:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1887b64a-dd18-25ff-a9f4-885c231c60b2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200708163929.2783-1-james.morse@arm.com>

Hi Reinette,

On 08/07/2020 17:39, James Morse wrote:
> These are the miscellaneous cleanup patches that floated to the top of
> the MPAM tree.

Is there anything else I should do with this series?
(Does patch 10 need an ACK from anyone else?)

Would a branch or pull request make anyone's life easier?


Thanks,

James

> The only interesting thing are the patches to make the AMD/Intel
> differences something resctrl understands, instead of just 'happening'
> because of the different function pointers.
> This will become more important once MPAM support is added. parse_bw()
> and friends are what enforces resctrl's ABI. Allowing an
> architecture/platform to provide a subtly different function here would
> be bad for user-space.
> 
> MPAM would set arch_has_sparse_bitmaps and arch_has_empty_bitmap, but
> not arch_needs_linear.

> Nothing in this series should change any behaviour.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-23 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-08 16:39 James Morse
2020-07-08 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] x86/resctrl: Nothing uses struct mbm_state chunks_bw James Morse
2020-08-19 12:33   ` [tip: x86/cache] x86/resctrl: Remove unused struct mbm_state::chunks_bw tip-bot2 for James Morse
2020-07-08 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] x86/resctrl: Remove max_delay James Morse
2020-08-19 12:33   ` [tip: x86/cache] x86/resctrl: Remove struct rdt_membw::max_delay tip-bot2 for James Morse
2020-07-08 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] x86/resctrl: Fix stale comment James Morse
2020-08-19 12:33   ` [tip: x86/cache] " tip-bot2 for James Morse
2020-07-08 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] x86/resctrl: use container_of() in delayed_work handlers James Morse
2020-08-19 12:33   ` [tip: x86/cache] x86/resctrl: Use " tip-bot2 for James Morse
2020-07-08 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] x86/resctrl: Include pid.h James Morse
2020-08-19 12:33   ` [tip: x86/cache] " tip-bot2 for James Morse
2020-07-08 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] x86/resctrl: Use is_closid_match() in more places James Morse
2020-08-19 12:33   ` [tip: x86/cache] " tip-bot2 for James Morse
2020-07-08 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] x86/resctrl: Add arch_needs_linear to explain AMD/Intel MBA difference James Morse
2020-08-19 12:33   ` [tip: x86/cache] x86/resctrl: Add struct rdt_membw::arch_needs_linear " tip-bot2 for James Morse
2020-07-08 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] x86/resctrl: Merge AMD/Intel parse_bw() calls James Morse
2020-08-19 12:33   ` [tip: x86/cache] " tip-bot2 for James Morse
2020-07-08 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] x86/resctrl: Add arch_has_{sparse,empty}_bitmaps to explain CAT differences James Morse
2020-08-19 12:33   ` [tip: x86/cache] x86/resctrl: Add struct rdt_cache::arch_has_{sparse, empty}_bitmaps tip-bot2 for James Morse
2020-07-08 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] cacheinfo: Move resctrl's get_cache_id() to the cacheinfo header file James Morse
2020-08-19 12:33   ` [tip: x86/cache] " tip-bot2 for James Morse
2020-07-23 18:31 ` James Morse [this message]
2020-07-23 20:31   ` [PATCH v5 00/10] x86/resctrl: Misc cleanup Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1887b64a-dd18-25ff-a9f4-885c231c60b2@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®