From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-audit@redhat.com, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: PATCH [1/1]: audit: acquire creds selectively to reduce atomic op overhead
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:02:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18893.1299607373@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110307210656.GA1750@suse.de>
Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de> wrote:
> Commit c69e8d9c01db added calls to get_task_cred and put_cred in
> audit_filter_rules. Profiling with a large number of audit rules active on
> the exit chain shows that we are spending upto 48% in this routine for
> syscall intensive tests, most of which is in the atomic ops.
>
> The following patch acquires the cred if a rule requires it. In our
> particular case above, most rules had no cred requirement and this dropped
> the time spent in audit_filter_rules down to ~12%. An alternative would be
> for the caller to acquire the cred just once for the whole chain and pass
> into audit_filter_rules. I can create an alternate patch doing this if
> required.
There's no actual need to get a ref on the named task's creds.
If tsk == current, no locking is needed at all.
If tsk != current, the RCU read lock is sufficient. See task_cred_xxx() in
include/linux/cred.h.
Hmmm... I wonder... The audit filter uses tsk->real_cred, but is that
correct? Should it be using tsk->cred? And is tsk always going to be
current?
> + const struct cred *cred=NULL;
Binary operators like '=' should have a space on each side.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-08 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-07 21:06 Tony Jones
2011-03-08 18:02 ` David Howells [this message]
2011-03-10 20:25 ` Tony Jones
2011-03-11 16:33 ` David Howells
2011-03-15 17:38 ` Tony Jones
2011-03-15 17:44 ` Eric Paris
2011-03-15 20:11 ` David Howells
2011-03-17 18:11 ` Tony Jones
2011-03-21 13:57 ` Eric Paris
2011-04-27 13:12 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-04-27 16:26 ` Tony Jones
2011-03-15 20:04 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18893.1299607373@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tonyj@suse.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome