mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: PATCH [1/1]: audit: acquire creds selectively to reduce atomic op overhead
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:02:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18893.1299607373@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110307210656.GA1750@suse.de>

Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de> wrote:

> Commit c69e8d9c01db added calls to get_task_cred and put_cred in
> audit_filter_rules.  Profiling with a large number of audit rules active on
> the exit chain shows that we are spending upto 48% in this routine for
> syscall intensive tests, most of which is in the atomic ops.
> 
> The following patch acquires the cred if a rule requires it.  In our
> particular case above, most rules had no cred requirement and this dropped
> the time spent in audit_filter_rules down to ~12%.  An alternative would be
> for the caller to acquire the cred just once for the whole chain and pass
> into audit_filter_rules.  I can create an alternate patch doing this if
> required.

There's no actual need to get a ref on the named task's creds.

If tsk == current, no locking is needed at all.

If tsk != current, the RCU read lock is sufficient.  See task_cred_xxx() in
include/linux/cred.h.

Hmmm...  I wonder...  The audit filter uses tsk->real_cred, but is that
correct?  Should it be using tsk->cred?  And is tsk always going to be
current?

> +	const struct cred *cred=NULL;

Binary operators like '=' should have a space on each side.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-08 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-07 21:06 Tony Jones
2011-03-08 18:02 ` David Howells [this message]
2011-03-10 20:25   ` Tony Jones
2011-03-11 16:33   ` David Howells
2011-03-15 17:38     ` Tony Jones
2011-03-15 17:44       ` Eric Paris
2011-03-15 20:11       ` David Howells
2011-03-17 18:11         ` Tony Jones
2011-03-21 13:57           ` Eric Paris
2011-04-27 13:12             ` Jiri Kosina
2011-04-27 16:26               ` Tony Jones
2011-03-15 20:04     ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18893.1299607373@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tonyj@suse.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome