From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] x86, perfcounters: add atomic64_xchg()
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:19:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18907.14029.301492.493938@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-b226fa12991d6ee9b6b13a7e1de88ec5d25f5007@git.kernel.org>
Ingo Molnar writes:
> Complete atomic64_t support on the 32-bit side by adding atomic64_xch().
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> LKML-Reference: <20090406094518.445450972@chello.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/atomic_32.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic_32.h
> index 977250e..a9fef6c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic_32.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic_32.h
> @@ -306,6 +306,12 @@ static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *ptr, unsigned long long new_val)
> } while (atomic64_cmpxchg(ptr, old_val, new_val) != old_val);
> }
>
> +static inline void
> +atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *ptr, unsigned long long new_val)
> +{
> + atomic64_set(ptr, new_val);
> +}
Umm, I don't know much about x86, but that doesn't look like an
exchange operation to me... Shouldn't it return a value, for a start?
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-07 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-06 9:44 [PATCH 00/15] various perf counter bits Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:44 ` [PATCH 01/15] perf_counter: update mmap() counter read, take 2 Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:06 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 02/15] perf_counter: add more context information Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:07 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 03/15] perf_counter: SIGIO support Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:07 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 04/15] perf_counter: generalize pending infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:07 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 05/15] perf_counter: x86: self-IPI for pending work Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:07 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 06/15] perf_counter: theres more to overflow than writing events Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:07 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 07/15] perf_counter: fix the mlock accounting Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:08 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 08/15] perf_counter: PERF_RECORD_TIME Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:08 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 09/15] perf_counter: counter overflow limit Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:08 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 10/15] perf_counter: comment the perf_event_type stuff Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:08 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 11/15] perf_counter: change event defenition Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:08 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: change event definition Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 12/15] perf_counter: rework context time Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:09 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 13/15] perf_counter: rework the task clock software counter Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:09 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:36 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] x86, perfcounters: add atomic64_xchg() Ingo Molnar
2009-04-07 11:19 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2009-04-07 13:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-07 10:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 14/15] perf_counter: remove rq->lock usage Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:09 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 9:45 ` [PATCH 15/15] perf_counter: minimize context time updates Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:09 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 9:21 ` [PATCH 00/15] various perf counter bits Ingo Molnar
2009-04-07 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-07 9:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-07 9:23 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18907.14029.301492.493938@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®