From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758077Ab3DAU6K (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:58:10 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:49606 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757584Ab3DAU6I (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:58:08 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPUFreq Updates & Fixes for 3.10 Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 23:05:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1893788.IlN605kbG3@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.9.0-rc4+; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, April 01, 2013 06:27:40 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > These are fixes and updates that are sent and reviewed as separate patchsets > earlier. They are all now combined as part of a single patchset for you to apply > in your linux-next branch. > > All have got reviews earlier and got fixups mailed and applied. > > The remaining patches: "Move Cpufreq drivers to drivers/cpufreq" are awaiting > few more Acks before I send them to you. > > I wanted to have another patch as part of this patchset, but I am awaiting Ack > for it: > tools: cpufreq: Fix cpufreq-info print messages for affected[related]_cpus > > That can be applied separately once it receives an Ack. > > Thanks > Viresh > > Viresh Kumar (9): > cpufreq: cpu0: Fix mistake in Documentation example > cpufreq: Documentation: Fix cpufreq_frequency_table name > cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: No need to check cpu number in init() > cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notifier for failure > cases too > cpufreq: Notify all policy->cpus in cpufreq_notify_transition() > cpufreq: Don't check if cpu is online/offline for cpufreq callbacks > cpufreq: drivers: don't check range of target freq in .target() > cpufreq: drivers: Remove unnecessary assignments of policy-> members > cpufreq: ARM big LITTLE: Add generic cpufreq driver and its DT glue Thanks! The [5/9] seems to be missing. Care to send? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.