From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 793A833123D for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 11:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769425882; cv=none; b=hcAH31EmwVXQBmlfO3541RBf/2mXEh7x7PcAGxKQkmAMWgn57i+A4Qn0CTwSXYTAI1LsVVsbJ8oHZV0x75D3Bj5SVGzfTr+YB+zOUbIyHlRMvIS5B8Tu9IU6+/lzMjG2o8l0sSL+NFxtPC69fzbTC9ReI2//YKG1+KObKtlwtTs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769425882; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GthLvZCwQKIB48Fpys6JOvaMVCJ1h0clP4FMY5Ci0L4=; h=In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From:Date:Message-ID; b=rJsKlBP+HI168SBheLUBxbWlvXwgItBXgUSsGcYnd6ilgAZvYRWHxuyfI6ifw2Dc3/zYWMZOr5dSy25s0dIbw0M4E4j0LnZY0Fcga+qXkKUrAX/JBC1N4ro7kqRhJBwoLw1+WQT4TC5hjW56Kx+h6fMCCIl8BOIVbKczIwFr+sM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Yt9PFBZh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Yt9PFBZh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1769425880; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RpKldkONcFT8Otswws0O8woIeUuD3t8FuXCWB4B+nN0=; b=Yt9PFBZhhmjjdkblCxz0WHKvK1rBVjyERRmPgxxX/XFYbMnbgADRbpmVj6mAUwATaP7lsI HPPqYg+hV7WkeGgoh7sb7E/le+oMjHOWQFOG4RvKPeFLCYtkqKM7c/3tl1IM5MWUW7zThd vULUiqSMgupMe/nN0XMcTLhslhw6STI= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-613-1iQiJDkaMNKqli0b2rUgIg-1; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 06:11:17 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 1iQiJDkaMNKqli0b2rUgIg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 1iQiJDkaMNKqli0b2rUgIg_1769425875 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437BD1956094; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 11:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.186]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B121956095; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 11:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 In-Reply-To: References: <20260121223609.1650735-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <20260121223609.1650735-4-dhowells@redhat.com> To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Lukas Wunner , Ignat Korchagin , Herbert Xu , Eric Biggers , Luis Chamberlain , Petr Pavlu , Daniel Gomez , Sami Tolvanen , "Jason A . Donenfeld" , Ard Biesheuvel , Stephan Mueller , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 3/5] pkcs7: Allow the signing algo to do whatever digestion it wants itself Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1902787.1769425830.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> From: David Howells Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 11:11:08 +0000 Message-ID: <1902869.1769425868@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > (1) Rename ->digest and ->digest_len to ->m and ->m_size to represent the > > input to the signature verification algorithm, reflecting that > > ->digest may no longer actually *be* a digest. > ... > These renames emit enough noise to be split into a separate patch. Yeah, I had considered that, so I've now done that. > > + if (sig->algo_takes_data) { > > + sig->m_size = sinfo->authattrs_len; > > + memcpy(sig->m, sinfo->authattrs, sinfo->authattrs_len); > > + sig->m[0] = ASN1_CONS_BIT | ASN1_SET; > > + ret = 0; > > + } else { > > + u8 tag = ASN1_CONS_BIT | ASN1_SET; > > + > > + ret = crypto_shash_init(desc); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + goto error; > > + ret = crypto_shash_update(desc, &tag, 1); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + goto error; > > + ret = crypto_shash_finup(desc, sinfo->authattrs + 1, > > + sinfo->authattrs_len - 1, > > + sig->m); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + goto error; > > + } Thinking further on this, I think it's better just to do the copy and modify unconditionally and then in the second case here just call crypto_hash_digest(). That means we end up doing a single crypto call on an aligned buffer. It's not like expect the authattrs to be particularly big for an RSA signature. David