From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755295AbZGNQHM (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:07:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755246AbZGNQHL (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:07:11 -0400 Received: from Mycroft.westnet.com ([216.187.52.7]:61910 "EHLO Mycroft.westnet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755115AbZGNQHK (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:07:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19036.44270.548043.875878@stoffel.org> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:06:06 -0400 From: "John Stoffel" To: James Bottomley Cc: Boaz Harrosh , John Stoffel , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Make SCSI SG v4 driver enabled by default and remove EXPERIMENTAL dependency, since udev depends on BSG. In-Reply-To: <1247578141.4310.34.camel@mulgrave.site> References: <1247513973-24899-1-git-send-email-john@stoffel.org> <19035.36432.181354.977939@stoffel.org> <4A5C27D4.5040204@panasas.com> <1247578141.4310.34.camel@mulgrave.site> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.9 under Emacs 22.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "James" == James Bottomley writes: James> On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 09:38 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 07/13/2009 10:43 PM, John Stoffel wrote: >> >>>>>> "John" == John Stoffel writes: >> > >> > Dammit, I messed up here sending this patch. I've just edited the >> > subject line and re-sent it with a bit more description. I think this >> > patch is perfectly good to go into 2.6.31 right now, esp since it's >> > not changing code, just whether the code is turned on by default from >> > now on. >> > >> >> I would like it if you'd also CC stable@kernel.org on this patch. As this >> condition is already true for distros in the field. James> The stable tree is for bug *fixes*. Moving an option out from James> under experimental is basically an enhancement, even if it James> could be argued it should have been done long ago. I'm not so sure I agree with this, since this feature is used by UDEV and has been enabled by default on a bunch of distros for ages (as I'm told, personally I haven't confirmed this). But if you object to stable back porting, what are you feelings on this change for 2.6.31-rc* now? Do you think it needs to be held off and that it's too late to make this change? Thanks, John