From: Fan Wu <12321260@zju.edu.cn>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Cc: Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
shenjian15@huawei.com, salil.mehta@huawei.com,
dingtianhong@huawei.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: hip04: fix RX buffer leak on build_skb failure
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:30:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <190A7669-E0EC-4257-B65E-817FFA1ACCDC@zju.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a361aa28-7f55-4476-9072-aa392a34b735@intel.com>
Hi Jacob,
Thanks for the review. I agree this is a rare allocation-failure path.
The leak is nevertheless deterministic from the ownership contract and
the driver's control flow. __build_skb() documents that, on failure, it
returns NULL without freeing the caller-provided data.
hip04_rx_poll() currently jumps to refill before dma_unmap_single().
Refill then replaces rx_buf[rx_head] and rx_phys[rx_head], so the old
fragment and its streaming DMA mapping are no longer reachable. The
stop and free-ring paths only operate on entries still referenced by
those arrays.
The fix leaves the slot, descriptor, rx_head, and rx_cnt_remaining
unchanged, and returns budget. This tells NAPI that RX work remains
outstanding and retries build_skb() using the same buffer. The additional
skb_free_frag() handles the separate case where a replacement fragment
was allocated but dma_map_single() failed before it was installed.
I hope this clarifies why the failure path is a deterministic leak even
though I do not have a dynamic reproduction on HIP04 hardware.
Thanks,
Fan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-12 14:27 Fan Wu
2026-07-15 0:17 ` Jacob Keller
2026-07-15 7:30 ` Fan Wu [this message]
2026-07-15 16:51 ` Jacob Keller
2026-07-15 16:52 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=190A7669-E0EC-4257-B65E-817FFA1ACCDC@zju.edu.cn \
--to=12321260@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fanwu01@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=shenjian15@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox