From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755967AbcBPUIu (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:08:50 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:42729 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753058AbcBPUIt (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:08:49 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Sudeep Holla Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Al Stone , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mahesh Sivasubramanian , Ashwin Chaugule , Prashanth Prakash Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] ACPI / processor : add support for ACPI0010 processor container Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:10:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1911447.Jqz0QvxEGY@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.5.0-rc1+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1449065446-26115-2-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <1449065446-26115-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1449065446-26115-2-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, December 02, 2015 02:10:42 PM Sudeep Holla wrote: > ACPI 6.0 adds support for optional processor container device which may > contain child objects that are either processor devices or other processor > containers. This allows representing hierarchical processor topologies. > > It is declared using the _HID of ACPI0010. It is an abstract container > used to represent CPU topology and should not be used to hotplug > purposes. > > This patch enables the support for these ACPI processor containers and > ensures the generic container/module devices are not created for them. I wouldn't say that it "enables the support". What it actually does is to prevent platform devices from being created for processor container objects. I can apply it right away with this changelog modification, though. Thanks, Rafael