From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755890AbdDEQYQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:24:16 -0400 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:52426 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755085AbdDEQVm (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:21:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: add stm32 qspi driver To: Marek Vasut , Cyrille Pitchen , Cyrille Pitchen References: <1490619296-8168-1-git-send-email-ludovic.Barre@st.com> <5224f3cd-a128-9e72-c0c8-62a137ceeb79@wedev4u.fr> CC: Boris Brezillon , Alexandre Torgue , , Richard Weinberger , , Rob Herring , , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse From: Ludovic BARRE Message-ID: <19157469-9fcd-27aa-f870-21e46f7ffcab@st.com> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 18:20:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.45] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG3NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.7) To SFHDAG6NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.16) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-04-05_12:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org hi Cyrille, Marek I've re-based and tested my patchset onto "mtd: spi-nor: introduce more SPI protocols and the Dual Transfer Mode" So I can deliver my patchset before or after Cyrille patchset How do you wish process? what version do you want for the v3? BR Ludo On 03/30/2017 12:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 03/30/2017 09:31 AM, Ludovic BARRE wrote: >> hi Cyrille >> >> I see your patch series >> >> [PATCH v5 0/6] mtd: spi-nor: parse SFDP tables to setup (Q)SPI memories >> >> No problem, I rebase my V2 onto your patch > I still didn't review that, so it might take a bit until it hits > mainline. I think the stm32 stuff looks pretty OK, so we can take that > before the SFDP stuff, no? >