From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
nrb@linux.ibm.com, gra@linux.ibm.com, schlameuss@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, david@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: s390: Fix KVM_S390_VCPU_FAULT ioctl
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:47:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19217e27-d015-460d-8460-7989b5e49c3c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323111033.66303-F-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
On 3/23/26 12:10, Steffen Eiden wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 05:15:42PM +0100, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>> A previous commit changed the behaviour of the KVM_S390_VCPU_FAULT
>> ioctl. The current (wrong) implementation will trigger a guest
>> addressing exception if the requested address lies outside of a
>> memslot, unless the VM is UCONTROL.
>>
>> Restore the previous behaviour by open coding the fault-in logic.
>>
>> Fixes: 3762e905ec2e ("KVM: s390: use __kvm_faultin_pfn()")
>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
>
> But I have a comment on a changed logic. And a nit
>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> index ebcb0ef8835e..62f04931b54d 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> @@ -5520,9 +5520,21 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>> }
>> #endif
>> case KVM_S390_VCPU_FAULT: {
>> - idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
>> - r = vcpu_dat_fault_handler(vcpu, arg, 0);
> in here every vcpu_ucontrol_translate error (incl ENONEMs from
> kvm_s390_mmu_cache_topup) is converted into EREMOTE ...
>> - srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
>> + gpa_t gaddr = arg;
>> +
>> + scoped_guard(srcu, &vcpu->kvm->srcu) {
>> + r = vcpu_ucontrol_translate(vcpu, &gaddr);
>> + if (r)
>> + break;
> ... which is not longer the case here. As you explicitly convert
> ENOMENS in gmap_ucas_translate before the topup call tnot converting
> might be an overlook (in the topup function?).
Yeah, I second that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 16:15 [PATCH v2 0/8] KVM: s390: More memory management fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-03-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] KVM: s390: vsie: Fix dat_split_ste() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-03-23 10:46 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-03-23 13:43 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-03-24 12:57 ` Janosch Frank
2026-03-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] KVM: s390: Remove non-atomic dat_crstep_xchg() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-03-23 10:46 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-03-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] KVM: s390: vsie: Fix check for pre-existing shadow mapping Claudio Imbrenda
2026-03-23 10:47 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-03-24 13:14 ` Janosch Frank
2026-03-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: s390: Fix gmap_link() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-03-23 10:47 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-03-24 14:01 ` Janosch Frank
2026-03-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] KVM: s390: vsie: Fix refcount overflow for shadow gmaps Claudio Imbrenda
2026-03-23 10:49 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-03-24 14:35 ` Janosch Frank
2026-03-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] KVM: s390: vsie: Fix unshadowing while shadowing Claudio Imbrenda
2026-03-24 14:52 ` Janosch Frank
2026-03-24 15:28 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-03-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] KVM: s390: vsie: Fix guest page tables protection Claudio Imbrenda
2026-03-24 15:20 ` Janosch Frank
2026-03-20 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: s390: Fix KVM_S390_VCPU_FAULT ioctl Claudio Imbrenda
2026-03-23 11:10 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-03-24 8:47 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2026-03-23 11:27 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19217e27-d015-460d-8460-7989b5e49c3c@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome