From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE443C3A5A5 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 09:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BEC206BA for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 09:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730547AbfHZJFE (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 05:05:04 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:41121 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726892AbfHZJFE (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 05:05:04 -0400 Received: from 79.184.255.249.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl (79.184.255.249) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.275) id 3ebf26800505d6b8; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:05:02 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Keith Busch Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , Dave Hansen , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] acpi/hmat: Skip publishing target info for nodes with no online memory Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:05:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1922204.kTHyOg1r71@kreacher> In-Reply-To: References: <20190805142706.22520-1-keith.busch@intel.com> <20190805142706.22520-4-keith.busch@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, August 12, 2019 10:59:58 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 4:30 PM Keith Busch wrote: > > > > From: Dan Williams > > > > There are multiple scenarios where the HMAT may contain information > > about proximity domains that are not currently online. Rather than fail > > to report any HMAT data just elide those offline domains. > > > > If and when those domains are later onlined they can be added to the > > HMEM reporting at that point. > > > > This was found while testing EFI_MEMORY_SP support which reserves > > "specific purpose" memory from the general allocation pool. If that > > reservation results in an empty numa-node then the node is not marked > > online leading a spurious: > > > > "acpi/hmat: Ignoring HMAT: Invalid table" > > > > ...result for HMAT parsing. > > > > Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen > > Reviewed-by: Keith Busch > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams > > When you send somebody else's patches, you should sign them off as a > rule, but since you sent this one with your own R-by, I converted that > to a S-o-b. > And all patches in the series have been applied. Thanks!