mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org>,
	Doug Smythies <doug.smythies@gmail.com>
Subject: [Resend][PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 00:00:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1928525.UHD8eb6HiL@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21371892.ALJNnHKoBY@vostro.rjw.lan>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Modify the schedutil cpufreq governor to boost the CPU
frequency if the SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag is passed to
it via cpufreq_update_util().

If that happens, the frequency is set to the maximum during
the first update after receiving the SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag
and then the boost is reduced by half during each following update.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Looks-good-to: Steve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -47,11 +47,13 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy;
 
 	unsigned int cached_raw_freq;
+	unsigned long iowait_boost;
+	unsigned long iowait_boost_max;
+	u64 last_update;
 
 	/* The fields below are only needed when sharing a policy. */
 	unsigned long util;
 	unsigned long max;
-	u64 last_update;
 	unsigned int flags;
 };
 
@@ -153,6 +155,36 @@ static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long
 	*max = cfs_max;
 }
 
+static void sugov_set_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
+				   unsigned int flags)
+{
+	if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT) {
+		sg_cpu->iowait_boost = sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max;
+	} else if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost) {
+		s64 delta_ns = time - sg_cpu->last_update;
+
+		/* Clear iowait_boost if the CPU apprears to have been idle. */
+		if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC)
+			sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
+	}
+}
+
+static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, unsigned long *util,
+			       unsigned long *max)
+{
+	unsigned long boost_util = sg_cpu->iowait_boost;
+	unsigned long boost_max = sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max;
+
+	if (!boost_util)
+		return;
+
+	if (*util * boost_max < *max * boost_util) {
+		*util = boost_util;
+		*max = boost_max;
+	}
+	sg_cpu->iowait_boost >>= 1;
+}
+
 static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 				unsigned int flags)
 {
@@ -162,6 +194,9 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct u
 	unsigned long util, max;
 	unsigned int next_f;
 
+	sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
+	sg_cpu->last_update = time;
+
 	if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
 		return;
 
@@ -169,6 +204,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct u
 		next_f = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
 	} else {
 		sugov_get_util(&util, &max);
+		sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, &util, &max);
 		next_f = get_next_freq(sg_cpu, util, max);
 	}
 	sugov_update_commit(sg_policy, time, next_f);
@@ -187,6 +223,8 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
 	if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL)
 		return max_f;
 
+	sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, &util, &max);
+
 	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
 		struct sugov_cpu *j_sg_cpu;
 		unsigned long j_util, j_max;
@@ -201,12 +239,13 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
 		 * frequency update and the time elapsed between the last update
 		 * of the CPU utilization and the last frequency update is long
 		 * enough, don't take the CPU into account as it probably is
-		 * idle now.
+		 * idle now (and clear iowait_boost for it).
 		 */
 		delta_ns = last_freq_update_time - j_sg_cpu->last_update;
-		if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC)
+		if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) {
+			j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
 			continue;
-
+		}
 		if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL)
 			return max_f;
 
@@ -216,6 +255,8 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
 			util = j_util;
 			max = j_max;
 		}
+
+		sugov_iowait_boost(j_sg_cpu, &util, &max);
 	}
 
 	return get_next_freq(sg_cpu, util, max);
@@ -236,6 +277,8 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct u
 	sg_cpu->util = util;
 	sg_cpu->max = max;
 	sg_cpu->flags = flags;
+
+	sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
 	sg_cpu->last_update = time;
 
 	if (sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) {
@@ -468,6 +511,8 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_po
 			sg_cpu->flags = SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT;
 			sg_cpu->last_update = 0;
 			sg_cpu->cached_raw_freq = 0;
+			sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
+			sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
 			cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(cpu, &sg_cpu->update_util,
 						     sugov_update_shared);
 		} else {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-09 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-09 21:57 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-09 21:59 ` [Resend][PATCH 1/3] cpufreq / sched: SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag to indicate iowait condition Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-13  7:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-09 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-09-13  7:44   ` [Resend][PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-09 22:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use IOWAIT flag in Atom algorithm Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-13 23:59   ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1928525.UHD8eb6HiL@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=Juri.Lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=doug.smythies@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=smuckle@linaro.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®