From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org>,
Doug Smythies <doug.smythies@gmail.com>
Subject: [Resend][PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 00:00:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1928525.UHD8eb6HiL@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21371892.ALJNnHKoBY@vostro.rjw.lan>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Modify the schedutil cpufreq governor to boost the CPU
frequency if the SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag is passed to
it via cpufreq_update_util().
If that happens, the frequency is set to the maximum during
the first update after receiving the SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag
and then the boost is reduced by half during each following update.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Looks-good-to: Steve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -47,11 +47,13 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
struct sugov_policy *sg_policy;
unsigned int cached_raw_freq;
+ unsigned long iowait_boost;
+ unsigned long iowait_boost_max;
+ u64 last_update;
/* The fields below are only needed when sharing a policy. */
unsigned long util;
unsigned long max;
- u64 last_update;
unsigned int flags;
};
@@ -153,6 +155,36 @@ static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long
*max = cfs_max;
}
+static void sugov_set_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
+ unsigned int flags)
+{
+ if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT) {
+ sg_cpu->iowait_boost = sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max;
+ } else if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost) {
+ s64 delta_ns = time - sg_cpu->last_update;
+
+ /* Clear iowait_boost if the CPU apprears to have been idle. */
+ if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC)
+ sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
+ }
+}
+
+static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, unsigned long *util,
+ unsigned long *max)
+{
+ unsigned long boost_util = sg_cpu->iowait_boost;
+ unsigned long boost_max = sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max;
+
+ if (!boost_util)
+ return;
+
+ if (*util * boost_max < *max * boost_util) {
+ *util = boost_util;
+ *max = boost_max;
+ }
+ sg_cpu->iowait_boost >>= 1;
+}
+
static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
unsigned int flags)
{
@@ -162,6 +194,9 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct u
unsigned long util, max;
unsigned int next_f;
+ sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
+ sg_cpu->last_update = time;
+
if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
return;
@@ -169,6 +204,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct u
next_f = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
} else {
sugov_get_util(&util, &max);
+ sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, &util, &max);
next_f = get_next_freq(sg_cpu, util, max);
}
sugov_update_commit(sg_policy, time, next_f);
@@ -187,6 +223,8 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL)
return max_f;
+ sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, &util, &max);
+
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
struct sugov_cpu *j_sg_cpu;
unsigned long j_util, j_max;
@@ -201,12 +239,13 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
* frequency update and the time elapsed between the last update
* of the CPU utilization and the last frequency update is long
* enough, don't take the CPU into account as it probably is
- * idle now.
+ * idle now (and clear iowait_boost for it).
*/
delta_ns = last_freq_update_time - j_sg_cpu->last_update;
- if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC)
+ if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) {
+ j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
continue;
-
+ }
if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL)
return max_f;
@@ -216,6 +255,8 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
util = j_util;
max = j_max;
}
+
+ sugov_iowait_boost(j_sg_cpu, &util, &max);
}
return get_next_freq(sg_cpu, util, max);
@@ -236,6 +277,8 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct u
sg_cpu->util = util;
sg_cpu->max = max;
sg_cpu->flags = flags;
+
+ sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
sg_cpu->last_update = time;
if (sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) {
@@ -468,6 +511,8 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_po
sg_cpu->flags = SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT;
sg_cpu->last_update = 0;
sg_cpu->cached_raw_freq = 0;
+ sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
+ sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(cpu, &sg_cpu->update_util,
sugov_update_shared);
} else {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-09 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-09 21:57 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-09 21:59 ` [Resend][PATCH 1/3] cpufreq / sched: SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag to indicate iowait condition Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-13 7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-09 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-09-13 7:44 ` [Resend][PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-09 22:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use IOWAIT flag in Atom algorithm Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-13 23:59 ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1928525.UHD8eb6HiL@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=Juri.Lelli@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=doug.smythies@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=smuckle@linaro.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®