From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: CONFIG_INPUT problems
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 10:29:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <193480000.1049909378@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
So we seem to have a problem with the way the config stuff deals
with CONFIG_INPUT, and I'd like some advice on the best way to
fix it.
The problem:
CONFIG_INPUT was commonly set to "n" in 2.4 kernels (and hence the
configs that upgrading people pick up). Even though it defaults to
"y" under the 2.5 subsystem, the old config overrides it, which I
guess is correct for most things, but it didn't govern keyboard
and (by cascade) CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE under 2.4 (I think).
The result:
Lots of people just get a really screwed up 2.5 kernel that does
nothing useful for them.
What to do ...
I thought about inverting the logic, and creating CONFIG_HEADLESS
which is !CONFIG_INPUT basically ... but changing all the stuff
depending on CONFIG_INPUT is rather invasive. So I was thinking of
something like
CONFIG_HEADLESS
bool "headless console support
default "n"
if HEADLESS = y
define_bool CONFIG_INPUT = n
else
define_bool CONFIG_INPUT = y
endif
or something vaguely along those lines ... except there doesn't
seem to be a way I can see to force a config option on from the
new config system? So that's actually a more general question, I guess ;-)
However, if someone has a better idea on how to not shoot the poor
users over CONFIG_INPUT / CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE, I'd be very interested ...
M.
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-09 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-09 17:29 Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-04-09 20:00 ` Roman Zippel
2003-04-09 20:02 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-09 21:24 ` Roman Zippel
2003-04-09 21:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='193480000.1049909378@[10.10.2.4]' \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®