From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
Cc: "Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
"Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ilw@linux.intel.com" <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [cfg80211 / iwlwifi] setting wireless regulatory domain doesn't work.
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:22:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1937118387.20131216122200@eikelenboom.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=NE6XRnE0j9NMW0K1vKzEO9v70arSH4YXZjudqa0ZxiLB4AA@mail.gmail.com>
Wednesday, December 11, 2013, 7:38:50 PM, you wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Sander Eikelenboom
> <linux@eikelenboom.it> wrote:
>>
>> Wednesday, December 11, 2013, 6:53:07 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> The best way to address all this is by automatic region awareness and
>>> doing the right thing on devices, this however requires good
>>> architecture / calibration data / etc and all that needs to be
>>> verified by the system integrators, and finally they need to be
>>> certified. If you want to hack your firmware and software go at it,
>>> just be aware there are reasons for things.
>>
>> Well the general problem seems to be "we don't trust the user" so we FORCE him to the lowest
>> common denominator (without a way to overrule that) so he is forced to operate *well* within the law.
> Its simply stupid to have the user be involved, period, the fact that
> a user would be involved should only be for testing or helping
> compliance for a busted device, development, research and obviously
> hacking. Linux allows all these but by default a device with firmware
> and a custom regdomain that will barf if you try to use a channel that
> is not allowed is a restriction in firmware. Feel free to reverse
> engineer that if you don't like it but it just won't be supported or
> go upstream. Now, the common denominator is generally optimized for
> best performance as well so you shouldn't have to do anything, and for
> APs -- this is typically carefully crafted for a region, also highly
> optimized.
>>>>> It doesn't seem like you are getting your original requests getting
>>>>> processed, so I don't think CRDA is passing it. Can you verify running
>>>>> from CRDA code:
>>>>
>>>> They don't get processed unless i remove the return from the code as i indicated.
>>>> If i remove that return it processes the request.
>>>>
>>>>> ./regdbdump /usr/lib/crda/regulatory.bin
>>>>
>>>> Although it's in a different location on Debian, /lib/crda/regulatory.bin
>>>> the dump seems fine.
>>
>>> OK thanks. Can you send a patch of what exact change you made, it was
>>> unclear from the paste you made.
>>
>>> diff -u file.c.orig file.c
>>
>> Well i just did a pull from wireless-next, to try Avinash Patil's patch.
>> net/wireless/reg.c had already changed much so i couldn't apply his patch without.
>>
>> With his patch it sets the regulatory domain, although as now expected i still can not use channels 12 and 13 yet,
>> probably due to those firmware restrictions.
> Its unclear what results you got, and yeah if the device is restricted
> then its just the fw telling the driver its channels and you can't use
> them. That's it. You won't be able to override information then unless
> you hack the firmware
Ping ?
Is there anymore information you need to *fix* the problem ?
> Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-16 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1507831110.20131018194349@eikelenboom.it>
2013-10-23 12:28 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-11 15:17 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-11 15:38 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-12-11 16:53 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-11 17:14 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-12-11 17:28 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-11 17:53 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-12-11 18:02 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-12-11 18:11 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-11 18:38 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-12-11 19:06 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-18 18:54 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-12-16 11:22 ` Sander Eikelenboom [this message]
2013-12-16 11:37 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-12-16 12:56 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-17 2:17 ` Julian Calaby
2013-12-17 9:45 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-17 20:33 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-17 21:27 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-12-17 21:49 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-17 22:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-12-18 9:16 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-12-18 9:18 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2013-12-18 9:25 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-18 9:26 ` Johannes Berg
2013-12-18 10:48 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-18 19:43 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-12-18 19:45 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-19 4:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-12-17 23:35 ` Julian Calaby
2013-12-18 7:50 ` Pontus Fuchs
2013-12-18 8:58 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-12-18 19:27 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-12-18 18:29 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-12-18 18:54 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-18 19:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
[not found] ` <CAJwzM1nwFa7z5gwh42aj39M2dxVXnuecDrhQkVyL+DDFAXwwbg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-12-11 17:00 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-12-11 17:17 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1937118387.20131216122200@eikelenboom.it \
--to=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®