From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] block: don't hide inode from block_device users
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:44:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <194577df-0402-6e3c-3534-af289b5494e0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWb6VgEjEZFexiV0@infradead.org>
On 10/13/21 16:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:57:12AM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Instead of tricks with struct bdev_inode, just openly place the inode
>> inside struct block_device. First, it allows us to inline I_BDEV, which
>> is simple but non-inline nature of it impacts performance. Also, make it
>> possible to get rid of ->bd_inode pointer and hooping with extra
>> indirection, the amount of which became a noticeable problem for the
>> block layer.
>
> What fast path outside of bdev.c cares about an inlined I_BDEV?
Mildly hot in io_uring w/o fixed files, but that's not peak perf,
but would also be great to get rid of bdev->bd_inode dereference,
e.g. lots of in fops.c.
Are you going to just hid the dereference in helpers or kill it
with some offseting magic?
> I have dusted off patches to reduce (and hopefully eventually kill)
> accesses to bd_inode outside of bdev.c, so this goes into the wrong
> direction.
>
> If needed I'd rather figure out a way to fix any smoking gun without
> this change.
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-13 8:57 [PATCH v2 0/3] on top of for-5.16/block Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: cache bdev in struct file for raw bdev IO Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: don't hide inode from block_device users Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 14:03 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 15:03 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 15:12 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-15 0:40 ` [kbuild-all] " Chen, Rong A
2021-10-13 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 18:44 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-10-14 4:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14 9:35 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 8:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] blk-mq: optimise *end_request non-stat path Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] on top of for-5.16/block Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 15:53 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=194577df-0402-6e3c-3534-af289b5494e0@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®