From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752320AbcAFOTr (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:19:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47125 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751717AbcAFOTo (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:19:44 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1452089005.2772.224.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1452089005.2772.224.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1452082979.2772.205.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1452010098.2772.169.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160105154703.31650.95150.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <2615.1452011971@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <9026.1452086487@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Mimi Zohar Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Petko Manolov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] X.509: Don't check the signature on apparently self-signed keys [ver #2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <19510.1452089981.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:19:41 +0000 Message-ID: <19511.1452089981@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mimi Zohar wrote: > Once the builtin keys are loaded onto the system keyring, isn't the > system keyring locked? No. David