From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1166148AbdDXHXm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 24 Apr 2017 03:23:42 -0400
Received: from mail.eperm.de ([89.247.134.16]:59236 "EHLO mail.eperm.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1166047AbdDXHXf (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 24 Apr 2017 03:23:35 -0400
From: Stephan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad.benyossef@arm.com>,
        Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org>, Ofir Drang <ofir.drang@arm.com>,
        Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] staging: ccree: add FIPS support
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 09:23:32 +0200
Message-ID: <1965077.Btm8atTi0c@tauon.chronox.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAOtvUMdYtLa10dUQ--5hxeYOAi+vw9OTLZF=WPmDS27cr6KvJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1492693983-8175-1-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com> <2100092.9meQszc5SR@tauon.chronox.de> <CAOtvUMdYtLa10dUQ--5hxeYOAi+vw9OTLZF=WPmDS27cr6KvJg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 09:07:45 CEST schrieb Gilad Ben-Yossef:

Hi Gilad,

> I guess we could change the function to indicate that a key is valid
> for decryption but not encryption
> and have the implementation limiting based on that if there is an
> interest in SP800-131A compliance.

I would be delighted to see and review a patch.

Ciao
Stephan