From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
David <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@savoirfairelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: sleep in _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:23:19 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1971016402.292095.1437232999941.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150718145830.GA17961@lunn.ch>
Hi all,
----- On Jul 18, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch wrote:
>> Good point. The timeout is most definitely quite large and for sure on
>> the safe side. It might make sense to add some statistics gathering to
>> see how long the maximum observed delay actually is.
>
> Hi All
>
> Statistics are something which can be used a lot, i bursts and
> interactivily. ATU, VTU etc, are much less often used. So different
> delays might be justified.
>
> I agree about doing some statistics gathering to determine actual
> delays needed.
>
> Andrew
What do you think about something like this?
Thanks,
-v
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
index 4f3701f..6471807 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
@@ -563,9 +563,10 @@ static bool mv88e6xxx_6352_family(struct dsa_switch *ds)
/* Must be called with SMI lock held */
static int _mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset,
- u16 mask)
+ u16 mask, unsigned int msecs)
{
unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ / 10;
+ unsigned long usecs = msecs * 1000;
while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
int ret;
@@ -576,7 +577,8 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset,
if (!(ret & mask))
return 0;
- usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+ if (usecs)
+ usleep_range(usecs, usecs + 1000);
}
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
@@ -585,7 +587,7 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset,
static int _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
return _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_STATS_OP,
- GLOBAL_STATS_OP_BUSY);
+ GLOBAL_STATS_OP_BUSY, 0);
}
/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */
@@ -872,13 +874,14 @@ error:
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NET_DSA_HWMON */
-static int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset, u16 mask)
+static int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset, u16 mask,
+ unsigned int msecs)
{
struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds);
int ret;
mutex_lock(&ps->smi_mutex);
- ret = _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, reg, offset, mask);
+ ret = _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, reg, offset, mask, msecs);
mutex_unlock(&ps->smi_mutex);
return ret;
@@ -887,33 +890,33 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset, u16 mask)
static int _mv88e6xxx_phy_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
return _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL2, GLOBAL2_SMI_OP,
- GLOBAL2_SMI_OP_BUSY);
+ GLOBAL2_SMI_OP_BUSY, 1);
}
int mv88e6xxx_eeprom_load_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
return mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL2, GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP,
- GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP_LOAD);
+ GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP_LOAD, 1);
}
int mv88e6xxx_eeprom_busy_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
return mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL2, GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP,
- GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP_BUSY);
+ GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP_BUSY, 1);
}
/* Must be called with SMI lock held */
static int _mv88e6xxx_atu_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
return _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_ATU_OP,
- GLOBAL_ATU_OP_BUSY);
+ GLOBAL_ATU_OP_BUSY, 1);
}
/* Must be called with SMI lock held */
static int _mv88e6xxx_scratch_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
return _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL2, GLOBAL2_SCRATCH_MISC,
- GLOBAL2_SCRATCH_BUSY);
+ GLOBAL2_SCRATCH_BUSY, 1);
}
/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-18 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 16:57 Vivien Didelot
2015-07-10 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: call _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait with SMI lock held Vivien Didelot
2015-07-10 17:13 ` Guenter
2015-07-10 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: sleep in _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait Guenter
2015-07-10 18:20 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-07-10 18:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-07-10 19:21 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-07-10 20:05 ` Guenter
2015-07-18 14:58 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-07-18 15:23 ` Vivien Didelot [this message]
2015-07-18 15:28 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1971016402.292095.1437232999941.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com \
--to=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®