mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	David <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel <kernel@savoirfairelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: sleep in _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:23:19 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1971016402.292095.1437232999941.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150718145830.GA17961@lunn.ch>

Hi all,

----- On Jul 18, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch wrote:

>> Good point. The timeout is most definitely quite large and for sure on
>> the safe side. It might make sense to add some statistics gathering to
>> see how long the maximum observed delay actually is.
> 
> Hi All
> 
> Statistics are something which can be used a lot, i bursts and
> interactivily. ATU, VTU etc, are much less often used. So different
> delays might be justified.
> 
> I agree about doing some statistics gathering to determine actual
> delays needed.
> 
>        Andrew

What do you think about something like this?

Thanks,
-v

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
index 4f3701f..6471807 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
@@ -563,9 +563,10 @@ static bool mv88e6xxx_6352_family(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 
 /* Must be called with SMI lock held */
 static int _mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset,
-			   u16 mask)
+			   u16 mask, unsigned int msecs)
 {
 	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ / 10;
+	unsigned long usecs = msecs * 1000;
 
 	while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
 		int ret;
@@ -576,7 +577,8 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset,
 		if (!(ret & mask))
 			return 0;
 
-		usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+		if (usecs)
+			usleep_range(usecs, usecs + 1000);
 	}
 	return -ETIMEDOUT;
 }
@@ -585,7 +587,7 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset,
 static int _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 {
 	return _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_STATS_OP,
-			       GLOBAL_STATS_OP_BUSY);
+			       GLOBAL_STATS_OP_BUSY, 0);
 }
 
 /* Must be called with SMI mutex held */
@@ -872,13 +874,14 @@ error:
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_NET_DSA_HWMON */
 
-static int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset, u16 mask)
+static int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset, u16 mask,
+			  unsigned int msecs)
 {
 	struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds);
 	int ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&ps->smi_mutex);
-	ret = _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, reg, offset, mask);
+	ret = _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, reg, offset, mask, msecs);
 	mutex_unlock(&ps->smi_mutex);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -887,33 +890,33 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset, u16 mask)
 static int _mv88e6xxx_phy_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 {
 	return _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL2, GLOBAL2_SMI_OP,
-			       GLOBAL2_SMI_OP_BUSY);
+			       GLOBAL2_SMI_OP_BUSY, 1);
 }
 
 int mv88e6xxx_eeprom_load_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 {
 	return mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL2, GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP,
-			      GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP_LOAD);
+			      GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP_LOAD, 1);
 }
 
 int mv88e6xxx_eeprom_busy_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 {
 	return mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL2, GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP,
-			      GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP_BUSY);
+			      GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP_BUSY, 1);
 }
 
 /* Must be called with SMI lock held */
 static int _mv88e6xxx_atu_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 {
 	return _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_ATU_OP,
-			       GLOBAL_ATU_OP_BUSY);
+			       GLOBAL_ATU_OP_BUSY, 1);
 }
 
 /* Must be called with SMI lock held */
 static int _mv88e6xxx_scratch_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 {
 	return _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL2, GLOBAL2_SCRATCH_MISC,
-			       GLOBAL2_SCRATCH_BUSY);
+			       GLOBAL2_SCRATCH_BUSY, 1);
 }
 
 /* Must be called with SMI mutex held */

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-18 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-10 16:57 Vivien Didelot
2015-07-10 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: call _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait with SMI lock held Vivien Didelot
2015-07-10 17:13   ` Guenter
2015-07-10 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: sleep in _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait Guenter
2015-07-10 18:20   ` Vivien Didelot
2015-07-10 18:36     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-07-10 19:21       ` Vivien Didelot
2015-07-10 20:05         ` Guenter
2015-07-18 14:58           ` Andrew Lunn
2015-07-18 15:23             ` Vivien Didelot [this message]
2015-07-18 15:28               ` Andrew Lunn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1971016402.292095.1437232999941.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com \
    --to=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@savoirfairelinux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®