From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] device core: Add flag to autoremove device link on supplier unbind
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:46:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1982222.Z9Wz93BAKD@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c0f5cb8-4805-4200-406f-0725122b524f@codeaurora.org>
On Thursday, July 5, 2018 6:28:16 AM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
>
> On 7/5/2018 4:49 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Vivek Gautam
> > <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/4/2018 4:14 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 9:16:20 AM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>>> Adding Ulf and Marek.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6/27/2018 6:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>>>> Add a flag to autoremove the device links on supplier driver
> >>>>> unbind. This obviates the need to explicitly delete the link
> >>>>> in the remove path.
> >>>>> We remove these links only when the supplier's link to its
> >>>>> consumers has gone to DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND state.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> >>>>> Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> >>>>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> >>>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >>>>> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> >>>>> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
> >>>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> >>>>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> >>>>> Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> >>>>> ---
> >>>> Hi Rafael, et al.
> >>>>
> >>>> Gentle ping.
> >>>> Do you have comments on this series. I would really like to conclude
> >>>> these
> >>>> device link additions sooner, and get things moving on the long awaited
> >>>> arm-smmu clock/runtime support series.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks again for reviewing these patches.
> >>> They are fine by me.
> >>>
> >>> I can queue them up for 4.19 if no one has objections (Greg in
> >>> particular).
> >>
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >>
> >> I will resubmit these 2 patches as part of the arm-smmu series, as one
> >> of the patch in the series depends on addition of
> >> DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER.
> >> So these 2 patches and arm-smmu series should go together.
> >> Can you please consider givnig your Ack?
> > I would prefer to apply them myself to be honest and put them on an
> > public git branch for you to pull from.
>
> Sure. Fine with me. I will base the smmu patches on your branch.
The patches have been applied and are available for pulling in the pm-core
branch of the linux-pm.git tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git pm-core
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-11 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-27 12:50 [PATCH 1/2] device core: Rename flag AUTOREMOVE to AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER Vivek Gautam
2018-06-27 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] device core: Add flag to autoremove device link on supplier unbind Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 7:16 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 10:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04 11:19 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 11:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-04 18:09 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 23:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-05 4:28 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-11 9:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-07-04 12:55 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-07-04 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] device core: Rename flag AUTOREMOVE to AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER Ulf Hansson
2018-07-04 17:37 ` Vivek Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1982222.Z9Wz93BAKD@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®