mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
To: Robert Uhl <ruhl@xaipete.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Access to local APIC registers during an interrupt handler
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:01:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19956.40070.962218.422362@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DF389D1.4090909@xaipete.org>

Robert Uhl writes:
 > Hi,
 > 
 > I wrote a small interrupt handler (for a 64 bit system) which is 
 > installed by a kernel module in the IDT. My handler just increments a 
 > global variable and then jumps to the original interrupt handler. So 
 > Linux does (hopefully ;-) not notice my handler. With sysfs I can read 
 > the value of these interrupt counter and know exactly how often a 
 > specific interrupt occured.
 > Of course on a multicore system the interrupts of all cores are counted 
 > together, but I want to separate between the cores. On newer CPUs I can 
 > use the instruction RDTSCP to get the CPU number in ECX, but on older 
 > CPUs it's unsupported.
 > So I had the idea to use the local APIC ID to check on which core my 
 > handler is executed, even though sometimes local APIC ID != core number, 
 > but the ID should be at least unique.
 > I get the address of the local APIC ID register at module init with
 > 
 > u64 lapic_idregister = (u64) fix_to_virt(FIX_APIC_BASE) + 0x20;
 > 
 > and use it in my interrupt handler (of course I push/pop all used 
 > registers):
 > 
 > movq (lapic_idregister), %rcx
 > movq (%rcx), %rcx

You're doing a 64-bit load from a 32-bit lapic register.

 > But on real hardware the last instruction seems to cause a page fault or 
 > something (SUSE with 2.6.37.6, Fedora with 2.6.38.6), the system simply 
 > reboots. Without this instruction, the handler is executed without any 
 > problems.
 > And in qemu with vanilla 2.6.37.6 and a buildroot system everything 
 > works fine!

If changing the above movq (%rcx), %rcx to use movl instead makes it
work in real HW, then you've found an accepts-invalid bug in qemu.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-12 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-11 15:29 Robert Uhl
2011-06-12 11:01 ` Mikael Pettersson [this message]
2011-06-12 12:22   ` Robert Uhl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19956.40070.962218.422362@pilspetsen.it.uu.se \
    --to=mikpe@it.uu.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ruhl@xaipete.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®