From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
To: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: "Jim Houston" <jim.houston@ccur.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Tejun Heo" <htejun@gmail.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lib/idr.c: initialize struct idr_layer
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:17:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0801271317o4b17dc28l3c93d4d28e3e2e73@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020801271300g316b87bgea6beb265b5c62d3@mail.gmail.com>
On Jan 27, 2008 10:00 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Hi Vegard,
>
> On Jan 27, 2008 10:07 PM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am testing my kmemcheck patches, and it has come up with a couple of
> > uses of uninitialized memory in lib/idr.c. These are (the line numbers
> > may differ slightly):
>
> [snip]
>
> > @@ -39,12 +39,16 @@ static struct idr_layer *alloc_layer(struct idr *idp)
> > {
> > struct idr_layer *p;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > + int i;
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&idp->lock, flags);
> > if ((p = idp->id_free)) {
> > idp->id_free = p->ary[0];
> > idp->id_free_cnt--;
> > - p->ary[0] = NULL;
> > + p->bitmap = 0;
> > + for(i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(p->ary); ++i)
> > + p->ary[i] = NULL;
> > + p->count = 0;
>
> But aren't these zeroed by idr_cache_ctor() already?
That would make sense. However...
idr_layer_cache is only used for allocations from idr_pre_get().
idr_pre_get() is only called from ida_pre_get().
If this analysis is correct, can this mean that the user has failed to
call ida_pre_get() before idr_get_new() was called?
Though in this case, idr_pre_get() actually *is* called first. Hmm...
I think there's a pretty big chance that kmemcheck is at fault :-(
Vegard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-27 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-27 20:07 Vegard Nossum
2008-01-27 21:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-27 21:17 ` Vegard Nossum [this message]
2008-01-27 21:21 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-01-27 21:30 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-01-27 21:35 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-01-27 21:56 ` Vegard Nossum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19f34abd0801271317o4b17dc28l3c93d4d28e3e2e73@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jim.houston@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®