From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
To: "Pekka Paalanen" <pq@iki.fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
"Pavel Roskin" <proski@gnu.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mmiotrace full patch, preview 2
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:13:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0803271613vc6d6e9ic0491643eb25a3e8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080309164050.2194461e@daedalus.pq.iki.fi>
Hi,
I may of course be wrong, but... Shouldn't the post_kmmio_handler(),
called from the die notifier chain, check for the DR_STEP condition?
This makes sure that the function is not called in the cases where the
source of the debug exception was not a single-stepping event. Though
I guess you'll also have other checks in place to notice that the
interrupt was not the one you were expecting. I guess a little extra
safety won't hurt though?
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi> wrote:
> +/*
> + * Interrupts are disabled on entry as trap1 is an interrupt gate
> + * and they remain disabled thorough out this function.
> + * This must always get called as the pair to kmmio_handler().
> + */
> +static int post_kmmio_handler(unsigned long condition, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct kmmio_context *ctx = &get_cpu_var(kmmio_ctx);
if (!(condition & DR_STEP))
return;
Vegard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-27 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-09 14:40 Pekka Paalanen
2008-03-09 14:46 ` Pekka Paalanen
2008-03-27 23:13 ` Vegard Nossum [this message]
2008-03-28 18:24 ` Pekka Paalanen
2008-03-28 20:25 ` mmiotrace bug: recursive probe hit Pekka Paalanen
2008-03-30 17:26 ` Pekka Paalanen
2008-04-03 21:07 ` Pekka Paalanen
2008-04-03 21:40 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-04 13:18 ` Pekka Paalanen
2008-04-05 7:36 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-05 7:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-05 12:39 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-05 15:58 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-06 17:32 ` Pekka Paalanen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19f34abd0803271613vc6d6e9ic0491643eb25a3e8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pq@iki.fi \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®