From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
To: "Roland Dreier" <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@sgi.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [git pull] kmemcheck
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:37:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0804300937k637e0308r36d4fa20899ff6bc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adazlrb8fxq.fsf@cisco.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> wrote:
> > kmemcheck: enable in the x86 Kconfig
>
> This patch does:
>
>
> > +config KMEMCHECK
> > + bool "kmemcheck: trap use of uninitialized memory"
> > + depends on X86_32
>
> So it's only possible to select kmemcheck on 32-bit builds, But you also
> seem to have 64-bit stuff, eg
>
>
> > kmemcheck: support for 64-bit
> > kmemcheck: add missing pte_hidden() for x86-64
>
> so is the Kconfig patch slightly out-of-date?
We don't officially support 64-bit yet, that is why it is disabled in
the Kconfig. The 64-bit parts are preliminaries, and as with 32-bit,
should have no impact when CONFIG_KMEMCHECK=n (as is the case for all
64-bit builds as you pointed out). It is largely untested, but
according to Pekka it at least boots in qemu with kmemcheck enabled
even for 64-bit.
So the 64-bit parts we have is basically to make it _compile_ even if
you force KMEMCHECK=y on a 64-bit build.
(The main obstacle standing in the way of fully supporting 64-bit is
the opcode decoding. I don't really know how the 64-bit registers
works, so I will have to read about it first :-))
Thank you for looking over!
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-30 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 20:34 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 16:29 ` Roland Dreier
2008-04-30 16:37 ` Vegard Nossum [this message]
2008-04-30 20:06 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-26 9:59 Vegard Nossum
2008-04-26 13:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-24 21:06 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 6:09 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19f34abd0804300937k637e0308r36d4fa20899ff6bc@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®