From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755339AbYFLFcA (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:32:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751936AbYFLFbt (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:31:49 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.224]:12645 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751564AbYFLFbs (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:31:48 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=TMqZXqNUIdcvkNFOmtSsDcsJ9wcaJZc1YoneYTATUSo380RBFVDgC4uniyiz+1c4bB 0kSjcXvxhl2Xx5S3Qvv5p3k8vbcbF1hUJy4wPrH4vn6R2XEl82AjGlZuIuQlHrUGZNpT deS1GxB9roczIaOSFe8saMLU6tirMYbKd8KBg= Message-ID: <19f34abd0806112231m69bd521fgbce3c5f8dd413423@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:31:47 +0200 From: "Vegard Nossum" To: "Len Brown" Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.26-rc5 Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , "Andrew Morton" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Linux Power Management List" , "Lin Ming" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Len Brown wrote: > please pull from: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release > > This will update the files shown below. What about the "ACPICA: Fixes for Unload and DDBHandles" patch? http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10669 The patch was reverted in mainline, but is now fixed, shouldn't it be brought back at some point? It's (still) listed as a regression, anyway. Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036