From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758692AbYFNJR7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:17:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754224AbYFNJRu (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:17:50 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.168]:55011 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754155AbYFNJRt (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:17:49 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=xx1w/S6Z7R7tr5k00LSwAxZ+2JwVh/I1D/Z5nV2vqJTeKyAhGBuDS2D1VfhXpbnKpL tHCsOA5+KCZ+kFhEylx4n7t6Z76DsARioBl/jCfBjRfJHYSjE2uaEs43JedTEjCuQ4b1 CWRoHWd5pWi9RmMVPp13ncqIS9ygvhiLmTh7M= Message-ID: <19f34abd0806140217x1ea73a8k1cae18a12128a2b1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:17:48 +0200 From: "Vegard Nossum" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kmemcheck: divide and conquer Cc: "Pekka Enberg" , "Thomas Gleixner" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080614090023.GA13798@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080613140057.GA25833@damson.getinternet.no> <20080614063114.GA24188@elte.hu> <19f34abd0806140139i70a5056ehbd8a6f5df81549e4@mail.gmail.com> <20080614090023.GA13798@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > a small workflow request: could you please start adding append-only > commits to that tree, if possible? Yes, I will. > it would be much better if you stopped rebasing kmemcheck from now on, > and did append-only updates only - that way i could pick up your updates > into tip/kmemcheck by doing pulls. It does not matter if the result > looks a bit messier - most of the fundamentals should be in place > already. I've created the "for-tip" branch which is (for now) just a copy of the current "current" branch. This branch ("for-tip") will henceforth NEVER be rebased. I won't guarantee this for the other branches, though; rebasing is really handy when the patch series is to be reviewed since it cuts down noise to the bare minimum, and avoids multiple changes to the same area of code (which is confusing to reviewers). I think I will append new commits to the "for-tip" branch, git-pull new kernel -rc releases, and rebase the result into a new branch (e.g. against-v2.6.26*). Now we have two heads which _should_ have exactly the same content, but where one retains a strictly incremental history, and the other is easy to read for reviewers. (And comparing them for differences is trivial; that's just a git-diff.) Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036