From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758339AbYGOUOs (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:14:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754693AbYGOUOk (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:14:40 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.174]:52222 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753029AbYGOUOj (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:14:39 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=BQtER+6GDgIWr4CtLHMhTe/SRQRTT/vvCXAeQuTK+GxLpFN2K5L5VaU1TO6Rlazhsm pP8JXo6xLEwpcZ8QSM+zvmgaz8AKz9/duw+81D25VEM7kYRk1TW77jYFO0mrssMmn7nR jOQrOVDBTpLcUEySMA8Tcr0FzVKuj32pF92Eg= Message-ID: <19f34abd0807151314r7462ecc4n8483c7e9fd52769f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:14:39 +0200 From: "Vegard Nossum" To: "Linus Torvalds" Subject: Re: [git pull] RCU updates for v2.6.27 Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , "Peter Zijlstra" , "Andrew Morton" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080714152045.GA29159@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> [ NOTE: due to merge interaction please pull this after >> kmemcheck-for-linus. The shortlog is relative to kmemcheck-for-linus. ] > > Hmm. I really wanted to wait with kmemcheck, which is huge and I'm not > entirely convinced yet. So now I'll have to wait for these fixes too, for > some reason that isn't clear. Hey, give us some credit; at least it's disabled by default ;-) But yeah, I'll continue to improve it and hopefully get it in better shape for next time, especially with regards to SMP support. Maybe we can finally have Andrew's review too, if he's not too busy giving all these talks and whatnot. Some of the things we've actually fixed up since last time include impact on the slab code, CodingStyle/checkpatch issues, and the splitting the huge single file of code into its own directory to make it more manageable. Oh, and I believe 64-bit support is new as well. Thanks, Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036