From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760730AbYHFL2m (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:28:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764049AbYHFL2Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:28:24 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.28]:38870 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763293AbYHFL2X (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:28:23 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=RtPpbh2wIBf751pSO2ibwfnCwN/LjDcj0QFjZRewpCK7F0/SiN1dvmbo0XrPtkIfGW TllPT5MiYASSK7jXBheQm8tc61D59/0nGQdCz6Br80ONyvK65fQ4iRjkGtIigc33W5B6 Y/jGNx/BfdnRcKlNU273zFblotwUHYkpHIPH4= Message-ID: <19f34abd0808060428m1c317531v4a58679c4051c0e9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:28:22 +0200 From: "Vegard Nossum" To: "Mike Frysinger" Subject: Re: [PATCH] blackfin/sram: use 'unsigned long' for irqflags Cc: "Bryan Wu" , "Julia Lawall" , "Alexey Dobriyan" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0808060405qf70ead2t2f2604802875197e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080806105836.GA2903@localhost.localdomain> <8bd0f97a0808060405qf70ead2t2f2604802875197e@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Vegard Nossum wrote: >> From 3ef36948a88a968eec1b09859aa251dc6727df4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Vegard Nossum >> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:00:23 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] blackfin/sram: use 'unsigned long' for irqflags >> >> Using just 'unsigned' will make flags an unsigned int. While this is >> arguably not an error on blackfin where sizeof(int) == sizeof(long), >> the patch is still justified on the grounds of principle. > > indeed, thanks > >> The patch was generated using the Coccinelle semantic patch framework. > > spam ? Hm? I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that. Do you think the credit is undeserved? > >> Cc: Julia Lawall >> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan >> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum > > should be CC Bryan Wu as well ... > -mike > Oh right. I believed that Bryan Wu is the maintainer who would eventually apply the patch, therefore I put him as a direct recipient of the e-mail (To-field) and that he would add his Signed-off-by line which would make the Cc-line redundant. I guess it makes some sense to also list the maintainer in the patch Ccs since the patch itself may be separate from the raw e-mail (e.g. in mail archives, which generally don't display To: or Cc: fields). I didn't realize this before. Thanks. Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036