From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
To: "David Wagner" <daw-news@cs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: fix overrun in attribute iteration
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:49:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0809112249j7d289caese42cfc019b4cac2c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gacp0q$drj$1@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:51 AM, David Wagner <daw@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Vegard Nossum wrote:
>> /**
>> * nla_ok - check if the netlink attribute fits into the remaining bytes
>> * @nla: netlink attribute
>> * @remaining: number of bytes remaining in attribute stream
>> */
>> static inline int nla_ok(const struct nlattr *nla, int remaining)
>> {
>> return remaining >= sizeof(*nla) &&
>> nla->nla_len >= sizeof(*nla) &&
>> nla->nla_len <= remaining;
>> }
>
> If 'remaining' had been declared to be of type size_t, this would
> not have happened.
Hm. Yes, it would!
The problem here is that "remaining" can legitimately contain negative
values (see the pointer advancement in nla_next()). And size_t can't
hold negative values.
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-12 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-11 20:59 Vegard Nossum
2008-09-11 22:04 ` David Miller
2008-09-12 0:35 ` Thomas Graf
2008-09-12 2:05 ` David Miller
2008-09-11 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-12 5:42 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-09-12 6:02 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-12 3:51 ` David Wagner
2008-09-12 5:49 ` Vegard Nossum [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19f34abd0809112249j7d289caese42cfc019b4cac2c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=daw-news@cs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®