From: "Takeo Tung" <kernel@takeo.idv.tw>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Michal Marek" <mmarek@suse.cz>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"Takeo Tung" <kernel@takeo.idv.tw>
Subject: [PATCH] struct io panic on raid1 - Re: block: unify flags for struct bio and struct request will kernel panic
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:05:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1AEF19B8648844C983F583EEBE9C46F4@TAKEOW7NB1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F2CA952B7B5A41259C5F950CA3454C3A@TAKEOW7NB1>
Dear Christoph,
I was check the patch again. I found the panic status haapen on Soft RAID 1.
I review it. found some define using bool, so some like ( x & REQ_SYNC) only
0 or 1.
so if bi_rw = rw | sync will bi_rw = rw | 0 or rw | 1. not rw | ( 1 <<
__REQ_SYNC).
So I write a patch is fix it. seems normal now. could you review the patch
or any comment?
Thanks
Takeo Tung
Signed-off-by: Takeo Tung <kernel@takeo.idv.tw>
--------
diff -urNp ./drivers/md/raid10.c.orig ./drivers/md/raid10.c
--- ./drivers/md/raid10.c.orig 2010-07-07 19:24:12.000000000 +0800
+++ ./drivers/md/raid10.c 2010-07-07 19:24:36.000000000 +0800
@@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ static int make_request(mddev_t *mddev,
int i;
int chunk_sects = conf->chunk_mask + 1;
const int rw = bio_data_dir(bio);
- const bool do_sync = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
+ const unsigned long do_sync = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
struct bio_list bl;
unsigned long flags;
mdk_rdev_t *blocked_rdev;
@@ -1716,7 +1716,7 @@ static void raid10d(mddev_t *mddev)
raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
bio_put(bio);
} else {
- const bool do_sync =
(r10_bio->master_bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
+ const unsigned long do_sync =
(r10_bio->master_bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
bio_put(bio);
rdev = conf->mirrors[mirror].rdev;
if (printk_ratelimit())
diff -urNp ./drivers/md/raid1.c.orig ./drivers/md/raid1.c
--- ./drivers/md/raid1.c.orig 2010-07-07 19:21:45.000000000 +0800
+++ ./drivers/md/raid1.c 2010-07-07 19:24:10.000000000 +0800
@@ -787,8 +787,8 @@ static int make_request(mddev_t *mddev,
struct bio_list bl;
struct page **behind_pages = NULL;
const int rw = bio_data_dir(bio);
- const bool do_sync = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
- bool do_barriers;
+ const unsigned long do_sync = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
+ unsigned long do_barriers;
mdk_rdev_t *blocked_rdev;
/*
@@ -1640,7 +1640,7 @@ static void raid1d(mddev_t *mddev)
* We already have a nr_pending reference on these
rdevs.
*/
int i;
- const bool do_sync = (r1_bio->master_bio->bi_rw &
REQ_SYNC);
+ const unsigned long do_sync =
(r1_bio->master_bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
clear_bit(R1BIO_BarrierRetry, &r1_bio->state);
clear_bit(R1BIO_Barrier, &r1_bio->state);
for (i=0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++)
@@ -1696,7 +1696,7 @@ static void raid1d(mddev_t *mddev)
(unsigned long long)r1_bio->sector);
raid_end_bio_io(r1_bio);
} else {
- const bool do_sync =
r1_bio->master_bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC;
+ const unsigned long do_sync =
r1_bio->master_bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC;
r1_bio->bios[r1_bio->read_disk] =
mddev->ro ? IO_BLOCKED : NULL;
r1_bio->read_disk = disk;
diff -urNp ./drivers/block/loop.c.orig ./drivers/block/loop.c
--- ./drivers/block/loop.c.orig 2010-07-07 19:21:12.000000000 +0800
+++ ./drivers/block/loop.c 2010-07-07 19:21:23.000000000 +0800
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int do_bio_filebacked(struct loop
pos = ((loff_t) bio->bi_sector << 9) + lo->lo_offset;
if (bio_rw(bio) == WRITE) {
- bool barrier = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_HARDBARRIER);
+ unsigned long barrier = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_HARDBARRIER);
struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
if (barrier) {
diff -urNp ./block/blk-core.c.orig ./block/blk-core.c
--- ./block/blk-core.c.orig 2010-07-07 19:14:55.000000000 +0800
+++ ./block/blk-core.c 2010-07-07 19:27:20.000000000 +0800
@@ -1198,9 +1198,9 @@ static int __make_request(struct request
int el_ret;
unsigned int bytes = bio->bi_size;
const unsigned short prio = bio_prio(bio);
- const bool sync = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
- const bool unplug = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_UNPLUG);
- const unsigned int ff = bio->bi_rw & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
+ const unsigned long sync = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
+ const unsigned long unplug = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_UNPLUG);
+ const unsigned long ff = bio->bi_rw & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
int rw_flags;
if ((bio->bi_rw & REQ_HARDBARRIER) &&
@@ -1719,7 +1719,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_insert_cloned_requ
*/
unsigned int blk_rq_err_bytes(const struct request *rq)
{
- unsigned int ff = rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
+ unsigned long ff = rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
unsigned int bytes = 0;
struct bio *bio;
---------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Takeo Tung" <kernel@takeo.idv.tw>
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 6:52 PM
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Michal Marek" <mmarek@suse.cz>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>;
<viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>; <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>; "Takeo Tung"
<kernel@takeo.idv.tw>
Subject: block: unify flags for struct bio and struct request will kernel
panic
> Dear Christoph,
>
> As subject, I revert the patch, seems boot is normal, but apply the patch,
> kernel will panic on scsi_setup_fs_cmnd, could you can check this? bcoz I
> check long time,
> no found why kernel will panic.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fnext%2Flinux-next.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=74450be123b6f3cb480c358a056be398cce6aa6e
>
> Thanks,
> Takeo Tung
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-07 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-11 15:13 linux-next-20100608 will /bin/sh: scripts/basic/fixdep: Permission denied Takeo Tung
2010-06-11 20:07 ` Michal Marek
2010-06-12 8:44 ` Takeo Tung
2010-06-12 9:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-12 19:35 ` Takeo Tung
2010-06-28 10:52 ` block: unify flags for struct bio and struct request will kernel panic Takeo Tung
2010-07-07 23:05 ` Takeo Tung [this message]
2010-07-07 23:17 ` [PATCH] struct io panic on raid1 - " Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-07 23:48 ` Neil Brown
2010-07-08 0:43 ` Takeo Tung
2010-07-08 1:15 ` Neil Brown
2010-07-08 1:42 ` Takeo Tung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1AEF19B8648844C983F583EEBE9C46F4@TAKEOW7NB1 \
--to=kernel@takeo.idv.tw \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®