mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf stat: Improve runtime stat for interval mode
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 22:08:43 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1CBA1092-64D6-460B-8F60-8D249DFE3440@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5724589-f653-f125-a227-b374ec575688@linux.intel.com>



On April 21, 2020 9:53:41 PM GMT-03:00, "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>Hi Arnaldo,
>
>On 4/21/2020 9:53 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:54:17PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
>>> For interval mode, the metric is printed after # if it exists. But
>>> it's not calculated by the counts generated in this interval. See
>>> following examples,
>>>
>>>   root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat -M CPI -I1000 --interval-count 2
>>>   #           time             counts unit events
>>>        1.000422803            764,809      inst_retired.any         
>#      2.9 CPI
>>>        1.000422803          2,234,932      cycles
>>>        2.001464585          1,960,061      inst_retired.any         
>#      1.6 CPI
>>>        2.001464585          4,022,591      cycles
>>>
>>> The second CPI should not be 1.6 (4,022,591/1,960,061 is 2.1)
>>>
>>>   root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat -e cycles,instructions -I1000
>--interval-count 2
>>>   #           time             counts unit events
>>>        1.000429493          2,869,311      cycles
>>>        1.000429493            816,875      instructions             
>#    0.28  insn per cycle
>>>        2.001516426          9,260,973      cycles
>>>        2.001516426          5,250,634      instructions             
>#    0.87  insn per cycle
>>>
>>> The second 'insn per cycle' should not be 0.87 (5,250,634/9,260,973
>is 0.57).
>>>
>>> The current code uses a global variable rt_stat for tracking and
>>> updating the std dev of runtime stat. Unlike the counts, rt_stat is
>>> not reset for interval. While the counts are reset for interval.
>>>
>>> perf_stat_process_counter()
>>> {
>>>          if (config->interval)
>>>                  init_stats(ps->res_stats);
>>> }
>>>
>>> So for interval, the rt_stat should be reset either.
>> 
>>                                s/either/too/g right?
>> 
>
>Yes, should use "too" here. :)

Ok

>
>> And please try and find what was the cset that introduced the
>problem,
>> so that we can have a Fixes: line and the stable series can pick it,
>ok?
> >
>> - Arnaldo
>>
>
>I have tried to find the patch which introduced this issue.
>
>51fd2df1e882 ("perf stat: Fix interval output values").
>
>This patch zeros stats for interval mode. I just think it should reset 
>rt_stat too.
>
>But I really don't know if it's fair to this patch so I don't add it in
>
>my patch description.

That's ok, this just speeds up the process, I'll check it :-)

- Arnaldo
>
>Thanks
>Jin Yao
>
>>> This patch resets rt_stat before read_counters, so the runtime
>>> stat is only calculated by the counts generated in this interval.
>>>
>>> With this patch,
>>>
>>>   root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat -M CPI -I1000 --interval-count 2
>>>   #           time             counts unit events
>>>        1.000420924          2,408,818      inst_retired.any         
>#      2.1 CPI
>>>        1.000420924          5,010,111      cycles
>>>        2.001448579          2,798,407      inst_retired.any         
>#      1.6 CPI
>>>        2.001448579          4,599,861      cycles
>>>
>>>   root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat -e cycles,instructions -I1000
>--interval-count 2
>>>   #           time             counts unit events
>>>        1.000428555          2,769,714      cycles
>>>        1.000428555            774,462      instructions             
>#    0.28  insn per cycle
>>>        2.001471562          3,595,904      cycles
>>>        2.001471562          1,243,703      instructions             
>#    0.35  insn per cycle
>>>
>>> Now the second 'insn per cycle' and CPI are calculated by the counts
>>> generated in this interval.
>>>
>>>   v2:
>>>   ---
>>>   Use just existing perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&rt_stat).
>>>   We don't need to define new function perf_stat__reset_rt_stat.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt | 2 ++
>>>   tools/perf/builtin-stat.c              | 1 +
>>>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt
>b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt
>>> index 4d56586b2fb9..3fb5028aef08 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt
>>> @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ Print count deltas every N milliseconds
>(minimum: 1ms)
>>>   The overhead percentage could be high in some cases, for instance
>with small, sub 100ms intervals.  Use with caution.
>>>   	example: 'perf stat -I 1000 -e cycles -a sleep 5'
>>>   
>>> +If the metric exists, it is calculated by the counts generated in
>this interval and the metric is printed after #.
>>> +
>>>   --interval-count times::
>>>   Print count deltas for fixed number of times.
>>>   This option should be used together with "-I" option.
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>>> index 9207b6c45475..3f050d85c277 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>>> @@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ static void process_interval(void)
>>>   	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts);
>>>   	diff_timespec(&rs, &ts, &ref_time);
>>>   
>>> +	perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&rt_stat);
>>>   	read_counters(&rs);
>>>   
>>>   	if (STAT_RECORD) {
>>> -- 
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>> 

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-20 14:54 Jin Yao
2020-04-21  7:10 ` kajoljain
2020-04-21 13:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-22  0:53   ` Jin, Yao
2020-04-22  1:08     ` Arnaldo Melo [this message]
2020-04-23 13:44     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-22  7:22 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08 13:05 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Jin Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1CBA1092-64D6-460B-8F60-8D249DFE3440@gmail.com \
    --to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®