From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86 <x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/special_insn: reverse __force_order logic
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:32:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1E3FD845-E71A-4518-A0BF-FAD31CBC3E28@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200902125402.GG1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
> On Sep 2, 2020, at 5:54 AM, peterz@infradead.org wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:18:57AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
>
>> Unless I misunderstand the logic, __force_order should also be used by
>> rdpkru() and wrpkru() which do not have dependency on __force_order. I
>> also did not understand why native_write_cr0() has R/W dependency on
>> __force_order, and why native_write_cr4() no longer has any dependency
>> on __force_order.
>
> There was a fairly large thread about this thing here:
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flkml.kernel.org%2Fr%2F20200527135329.1172644-1-arnd%40arndb.de&data=02%7C01%7Cnamit%40vmware.com%7C387b68745a984454d50708d84f3f499c%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637346480527901622&sdata=PR%2BCUy%2FYNKza6he78coaDR3x1G7BYuzFfS9SGfWZ9p8%3D&reserved=0
>
> I didn't keep up, but I think the general concensus was that it's
> indeed a bit naf.
Thanks for pointer. I did not see the discussion, and embarrassingly, I have
also never figured out how to reply on lkml emails without registering to
lkml.
Anyhow, indeed, the patch that Arvind provided seems to address this issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-02 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-01 16:18 Nadav Amit
2020-09-02 12:45 ` hpa
2020-09-02 12:54 ` peterz
2020-09-02 15:32 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2020-09-02 16:56 ` peterz
2020-09-02 16:58 ` Nadav Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1E3FD845-E71A-4518-A0BF-FAD31CBC3E28@vmware.com \
--to=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®