From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752728AbbGOMHX (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:07:23 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:42991 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751597AbbGOMHV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:07:21 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <55A5E100.3070900@suse.com> References: <1436532481-1224-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <20150710133912.GI23038@l.oracle.com> <55A5E100.3070900@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: Re: [Patch V5 00/16] xen: support pv-domains larger than 512GB From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:07:11 -0400 To: Juergen Gross CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com Message-ID: <1EB58ABC-2F53-4B36-A2D7-FDF4C7332EA3@oracle.com> X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On July 15, 2015 12:26:40 AM EDT, Juergen Gross wrote: >On 07/10/2015 03:39 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:47:45PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> Support 64 bit pv-domains with more than 512GB of memory. >>> >>> Following test have been done: >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 1TB machine (resolving p2m/E820-map conflict) >>> - 32 bit dom0 on 8GB machine >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked kernel/E820-map conflict >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked pgtable/E820-map conflict >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked initrd/E820-map conflict >>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked p2m/E820-map conflict >>> - 64 bit domU (sizes up to 900GB) >>> - 32 bit domU >> >> Woot! >> >> Thank you for doing that. I noticed that you used the 'normal' >> sizes, but nothing as odd as '3145M' or such to try to break >> things. Not sure if it is worht it - as the test suite that >> Boris runs does run with some odd sizes to catch this. > >How did you notice the domU sizes from these lines? :-) Intuition :-) > >I tested with sizes being power of 2 as well as other values (e.g. >100000 MB). > >> I only had one comment about the #13 patch, otherwise I think >> we are OK with this patchset? > >Can I take this as an "Acked-by" for the other patches? Yes! > > >Juergen