mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Roman Kisel <romank@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: simplify smp_call_function_any()
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 13:06:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a0b35d0-d739-4f1c-9a50-95780eed02e4@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251008165746.144503-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>

On 2025-10-08 12:57, Yury Norov (NVIDIA) wrote:
> The functions calls get_cpu()/put_cpu() meaningless because the actual
> CPU that would execute the caller's function is not necessarily the
> current one.
> 
> The smp_call_function_single() which is called by
> smp_call_function_any() does the right get/put protection.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov (NVIDIA) <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> ---
>   kernel/smp.c | 8 ++------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index 02f52291fae4..fa50ed459703 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -754,17 +754,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_single_async);
>   int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
>   			  smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait)
>   {
> -	unsigned int cpu;
> -	int ret;
> +	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();

I wonder whether this passes any moderate testing with kernel debug
options enabled. I would at the very least expect a
raw_smp_processor_id() call here not to trip debug warnings.

AFAIU smp_call_function_any call be called from preemptible context,
right ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

>   
>   	/* Try for same CPU (cheapest) */
> -	cpu = get_cpu();
>   	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
>   		cpu = sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(mask, 0, cpu_to_node(cpu));
>   
> -	ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
> -	put_cpu();
> -	return ret;
> +	return smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
>   


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-08 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-08 16:57 Yury Norov (NVIDIA)
2025-10-08 17:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2025-10-09 14:58   ` Yury Norov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1a0b35d0-d739-4f1c-9a50-95780eed02e4@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=romank@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®