From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 849C5207A01; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742292887; cv=none; b=GbLxIBroaGQJjtyyue3HbUHIZZB1KhnO1useIJd2kSdCgbkitu3g7QXI/qPcV5CS5L5GxvHlZSTHYIwd6dJUjKYyQxgctv3gZRLLQgNuJS+6LyEB1d+IHaeFT3tG0xoHA4LeK7pw3IW79EXjHmHHYk4a/aDtiZUlLpFlDNF8Zlc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742292887; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RU1GG8P/fyn/N99uW51RxZ6VdojKLsD0tL5X3G1oLKI=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=mKsldug2IDFRbElfvIJ5Ge6aAzdFcuqj/yYalgAaXg8owq1SfvbZmYS9hGaVI95YI5CTDVfHZlhQ99i08AVNt67fpKkLeuele52mOZoTAGX/muW0GYg1ACAWTfx8Vy3hEms19uA2LzVPxqp1rL/eY4MfH+0ixIapm5ocLFJIjrc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=pQdsj08h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="pQdsj08h" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=RU1GG8P/fyn/N99uW51RxZ6VdojKLsD0tL5X3G1oLKI=; t=1742292885; x=1743502485; b=pQdsj08hCTqaKqY3VgKEan977qCht5QDQbATEJrjz79gFiq xKLhtv74r9JB94lpAbtAQQtfJWrra/ODf3GOD6T5q+RxqwZrhvlK28SxrmyePXvBW4gLLZM+5v++W zuTHgO3+7PXfHGByaq2kfz5zane8JxR4+SpU4r7/vaW8RXfntHXDBQMbwZZdIE571MZcDA2LMTGSq 6t4Wa3tA91kfu2hhZ34DT2duQEOY4pe7tsB3PXI8se4rN0YdaajQIYMbUNanYWWu9re5zb27TIM8t PSMYTQ2mKifgsO6sb+K9lGAulQtaGlwhGKRfEAlyhsYwLz2CnX5yKSp6TUXITnVg==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tuTxt-0000000FD90-1rsq; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:14:29 +0100 Message-ID: <1a1ea09ae8cd82db0b8c3205bfd179bacfce4700.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: pass correct target to bindgen on Usermode Linux From: Johannes Berg To: Miguel Ojeda , David Gow , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , linux-um Cc: Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= , Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross , Danilo Krummrich , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:14:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20250208-rust-kunit-v1-0-94a026be6d72@weissschuh.net> <20250208-rust-kunit-v1-1-94a026be6d72@weissschuh.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 11:10 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 9:07=E2=80=AFAM David Gow w= rote: > >=20 > > Is there anything holding this up for the upcoming merge window? > >=20 > > Miguel: I'm assuming you'd rather take this (and possibly [1] as well) > > via Rust, but if it goes in via the uml tree, that'd be fine by me, > > too. >=20 > We try to get arch maintainers involved (and everyone else, of > course), i.e. it is up to them. But I see only the list was Cc'd, not > them directly, for some reason -- doing it here. The list is fine, but the patch wasn't even CC'ed there, so we don't have it in our patchwork: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-um/list/ > Ideally, maintainers get involved and pick their own Rust-related > patches, but I can also do so with an Acked-by from them, which would > be nice. I was just picking up um patches, but given that it was a series, and changes rust/ rather than arch/um/, I think it's probably better if you do it, so: Acked-by: Johannes Berg johannes