From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DC6C5CFF1 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A845208C1 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=synopsys.com header.i=@synopsys.com header.b="LMhfE16s" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5A845208C1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=synopsys.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934318AbeFLOv2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:51:28 -0400 Received: from smtprelay.synopsys.com ([198.182.37.59]:40707 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933228AbeFLOv0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:51:26 -0400 Received: from mailhost.synopsys.com (mailhost3.synopsys.com [10.12.238.238]) by smtprelay.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6DD1E04F8; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:51:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synopsys.com; s=mail; t=1528815084; bh=OSD9rGKKDdqajB/yyXAoLqFcDI2wqN2iGsuiVSpqL9s=; h=Subject:To:References:CC:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LMhfE16s493V4EPc5Ii1msUb47HGp67l+xwVFp1aZo3Dcy8rkTzeAILttRzpGLQCS ulcZBDaUHLIOWNZmf6TTDqFFZ6SA0h4njnclOz7sSgKh/kuT4IfrJHJ9d7gKwamxbZ x7iMV8P+3YoYITfL8OXDOUNWUe3ogWEKLu4YG7nh91+1X2yneYEqmcLdyiUENKNYns C3yTEJRFStQcXCGYbiEsP3UBZaLK6/L5dk0qAB4eMDDKwZ6+6rQwfzszOzFo5HGPmu MscwbL8vZNdskD8lEsxWU0UB1mWv1laTs6l6X0gkQRNhz5Q6H/mH6E5svvtvSXoTbC FrwxcY6z36Aug== Received: from us01wehtc1.internal.synopsys.com (us01wehtc1-vip.internal.synopsys.com [10.12.239.236]) by mailhost.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC433F09; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 07:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DE02WEHTCA.internal.synopsys.com (10.225.19.92) by us01wehtc1.internal.synopsys.com (10.12.239.235) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 07:51:22 -0700 Received: from DE02WEHTCB.internal.synopsys.com (10.225.19.94) by DE02WEHTCA.internal.synopsys.com (10.225.19.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:51:19 +0200 Received: from [10.0.2.15] (10.107.19.20) by DE02WEHTCB.internal.synopsys.com (10.225.19.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:51:19 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 RFC] Revert "net: stmmac: fix build failure due to missing COMMON_CLK dependency" To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , Ralf Baechle , James Hogan , Giuseppe Cavallaro , "Alexandre Torgue" , Jose Abreu , Corentin Labbe , "David S . Miller" References: <1528706663-20670-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <1528706663-20670-4-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> CC: Arnd Bergmann , , , , From: Jose Abreu Message-ID: <1a1f3bea-1680-ce1c-09cb-0d5e2b4531d1@synopsys.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 15:51:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1528706663-20670-4-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.107.19.20] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 11-06-2018 09:44, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > This reverts commit bde4975310eb1982bd0bbff673989052d92fd481. > > All legacy clock implementations now implement clk_set_rate() (Some > implementations may be dummies, though). > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > This seems okay by me. You can send a non-rfc patch with my ack once other 2 patches get accepted: Acked-by: Jose Abreu Thanks and Best Regards, Jose Miguel Abreu