From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sched/deadline: total_bw leak when a task leaves SCHED_DEADLINE while not queued
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 14:47:23 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a24bcdde0bb6e4a8c839351002e841d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auRh42kZI1xLIWNr@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb>
Hello, Juri.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 10:22:43AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Does the below help?
Yes, it fixes the leak. On abf8c33470f7 with the patch, the reproducer leaks
0 in all three cases, and 60s of random policy churn ends with total_bw back
at its starting value. Two problems though.
sched_setattr(SCHED_OTHER) with SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS on a sleeping
DEADLINE task leaves it DEADLINE, but each call releases its bandwidth, and
its exit releases it again. total_bw relative to before the task became
DEADLINE, with a 2ms/10ms task (0.2 CPU = 209715):
after the DEADLINE set +209715
after the 1st KEEP_PARAMS call 0
after the 2nd -209715
after the 3rd -419430
after the task exits -629145
After that, sched_setattr(SCHED_DEADLINE) for a new 2ms/10ms task fails with
-EBUSY while a 3ms/10ms one is admitted, and offlining a CPU fails with
-EBUSY.
Switching a sleeping DEADLINE task to SCHED_OTHER after its CPU was offlined
crashes in the __dl_sub() the patch adds, dividing by
dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p)), which is 0 for that root domain:
Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
RIP: 0010:switched_from_dl+0x13a/0x3e0
Unpatched mainline only leaks in this case.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-31 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 21:55 Tejun Heo
2026-10-30 9:22 ` Juri Lelli
2026-10-31 0:47 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a24bcdde0bb6e4a8c839351002e841d@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®