From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755713AbcIFT4O (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:56:14 -0400
Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.12]:43241 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1755095AbcIFT4M (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:56:12 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] Documentation: Add support for TI System Control
 Interface (TI-SCI) protocol
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
References: <20160830130647.6828-1-nm@ti.com>
 <20160830130647.6828-2-nm@ti.com> <20160902150628.GA19493@rob-hp-laptop>
 <CAGo_u6q0xxnUj5ary82OU1uP=kTHfA_3N7_d7OiSEwS1_5dXuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <57C9E0A8.4010701@ti.com> <6c63b044-3db9-9202-b790-350a88b9eab0@ti.com>
CC: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
        "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Andrew F . Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@ti.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
        dt list <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Message-ID: <1a382d12-e5d8-7403-6a0f-a1a8a35bd571@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 14:55:36 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c63b044-3db9-9202-b790-350a88b9eab0@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 09/05/2016 02:09 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 02/09/16 23:27, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>> On 09/02/2016 12:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> +
>>>>> +TI-SCI Client Device Node:
>>>>> +========================
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci"
>>>>> property.
>>>>
>>>> As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained
>>>> (i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also
>>> assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here.
>>>
>>> Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
>>> -> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned.
>>>
>>> Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections?
>>
>> No objections, I think this is a logical move.
>
> Yea, sounds like a valid change. I believe you are going to post a new
> version so I can modify the clock driver also accordingly?

Just closing the loop here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/6/747 posted. 
the changes are in binding - clk driver itself should'nt by itself 
have any changes.


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon