From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
llong@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] generalize panic_print's dump function to be used by other kernel parts
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 16:23:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a5bc420-c716-4d0b-b767-32adf32f4958@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCFnjmRWwBjgV2Hv@U-2FWC9VHC-2323.local>
On 2025/5/12 11:14, Feng Tang wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 06:46:17PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 May 2025 16:52:51 +0800 Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When working on kernel stability issues, panic, task-hung and
>>> software/hardware lockup are frequently met. And to debug them, user
>>> may need lots of system information at that time, like task call stacks,
>>> lock info, memory info etc.
>>>
>>> panic case already has panic_print_sys_info() for this purpose, and has
>>> a 'panic_print' bitmask to control what kinds of information is needed,
>>> which is also helpful to debug other task-hung and lockup cases.
>>>
>>> So this patchset extract the function out, and make it usable for other
>>> cases which also need system info for debugging.
>>>
>>> Locally these have been used in our bug chasing for stablility issues
>>> and was helpful.
>>
>> Truth. Our responses to panics, oopses, WARNs, BUGs, OOMs etc seem
>> quite poorly organized. Some effort to clean up (and document!) all of
>> this sounds good.
>>
>> My vote is to permit the display of every scrap of information we can
>> think of in all situations. And then to permit users to select which of
>> that information is to be displayed under each situation.
Completely agreed. The tricky part is making a global knob that works for
all situations without breaking userspace, but it's a better system-wide
approach ;)
>
> Good point! Maybe one future todo is to add a gloabl system info dump
> function with ONE global knob for selecting different kinds of information,
> which could be embedded into some cases you mentioned above.
IMHO, for features with their own knobs, we need:
a) The global knob (if enabled) turns on all related feature-level knobs,
b) while still allowing users to manually override individual knobs.
Something like:
If SYS_PRINT_ALL_CPU_BT (global knob) is on, it enables
hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace
for hung-task situation automatically. But users can still disable it via
hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace.
Anyway, the global knob (when set) controls all feature-level knobs, but
they can override it if explicitly set ;)
Thanks,
Lance
>
>> As for this patchset - sounds good to me. For now I'll await input
>> from reviewers.
>
> Thank you!
>
> - Feng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-12 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-11 8:52 Feng Tang
2025-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] kernel/panic: generalize panic_print's function to show sys info Feng Tang
2025-05-13 9:57 ` Petr Mladek
2025-05-13 13:23 ` Feng Tang
2025-05-15 10:32 ` Petr Mladek
2025-05-15 11:28 ` Lance Yang
2025-05-16 5:38 ` Feng Tang
2025-05-16 13:39 ` Lance Yang
2025-05-21 5:31 ` Feng Tang
2025-06-10 15:44 ` Petr Mladek
2025-06-11 13:43 ` Feng Tang
2025-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] kernel/hung_task: add option to dump system info when hung task detected Feng Tang
2025-05-11 8:52 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] kernel/watchdog: add option to dump system info when system is locked up Feng Tang
2025-05-12 1:46 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] generalize panic_print's dump function to be used by other kernel parts Andrew Morton
2025-05-12 3:14 ` Feng Tang
2025-05-12 8:23 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-05-12 9:31 ` Feng Tang
2025-05-13 13:27 ` Petr Mladek
2025-05-13 17:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-05-14 3:33 ` Feng Tang
2025-05-14 13:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-05-14 3:22 ` Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a5bc420-c716-4d0b-b767-32adf32f4958@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®