From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFE0C67871 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233708AbjAPTGo (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 14:06:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33568 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233675AbjAPTGe (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 14:06:34 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B567274BF for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:06:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id x36so7307224ede.13 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:06:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CV8tAfRPf2IHKFO84VR70240CzDv/yHe+xWXBC9YNck=; b=QeJDGv2fUxNWwwetKotPZ+TRh8gJ+RlvO1uxBkjuQb8ZkAeeYnLOALxczfeh1MtpTl n08bJKkqBv3F3+bKDR1PjNg3wIcxrtb9Of+pgl2avg185N8CXce/m3zUpQ1kxVFneVRt WAFZtgGeaZ3ttMQ7H64Xw4sUpfJK0Ek5uQAHH3nI/uqEb3eEZDESzY+Vg39eotfynjGw TdpgVKRsCJmU7aSh0HDmWjvt2mebSkp46uH0fi1eWSHZpzW6Pmf2m7/M9yW0g327aTd4 k4zALpCg0fGdSo8V/YssbcYg8VO/9wiqI5N+Mdk0d3VPT1kCRYyu2NQ1Iugow5LmK3dC 3lnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CV8tAfRPf2IHKFO84VR70240CzDv/yHe+xWXBC9YNck=; b=MlKKO6GSoNxyZFWfsKxfN/d+Qa23wL3mH26xE4xUyBt48gYQpczu+57mtcFfVhjAEd RbnTgSf0990A6AyH677utaKt64J2ToviAaFt6tquicN+S7Fj9hFuWGDyYUsUrmv0++8s DbRD/8CpNb/ydcbWGCHCsWeIo5lzHhQmupQmywgusjlhECSUs+AFjEPFsO48JW7+nBSi WfWVTXtsiSOGgyoo+bWPPMaFgICZgNhipvOnq3MtnHYMd81ILGsfYPtoUZh8na4GuNI9 +KHY2r63Ow6UFwyXt1ZGHRJyKzVpqglW1mKNh8QKpeUoy9DJSC6sHnizznipbKrh/tWB RSGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr4sloLFtl/EodYQZiam2tKJGLskySLKF8TyBX40nSVtFtkVHYy tAEt6CYyFYJjmC2YBB32jXAOnA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsjBZjMnuV7YVxZpvP0hj3P56j70NAIFlFg7nArqAvUb/4acMKxsEX19XftKcyXLdXMVou5Jw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dbc4:0:b0:47c:445b:b4f with SMTP id v4-20020aa7dbc4000000b0047c445b0b4fmr296641edt.32.1673895992067; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:06:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.109] ([178.197.216.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d20-20020a170906305400b007c0d64c1886sm12096487ejd.33.2023.01.16.11.06.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:06:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1a70a28b-b406-4d84-ced9-4d66bad94652@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 20:06:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: ti: Add new compatible for AM62 SoC family Content-Language: en-US To: Devarsh Thakkar , andersson@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, s-anna@ti.com Cc: hnagalla@ti.com, praneeth@ti.com, nm@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com, a-bhatia1@ti.com, j-luthra@ti.com References: <20230116151906.549384-1-devarsht@ti.com> <20230116151906.549384-3-devarsht@ti.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20230116151906.549384-3-devarsht@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16/01/2023 16:19, Devarsh Thakkar wrote: > AM62 family of devices don't have a R5F cluster, instead > they have single core DM R5F. > Add new compatible string ti,am62-r5fss to support this scenario. > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540 If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. Best regards, Krzysztof